← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Social Interactions in Endogenous Groups
Shuyang Sheng, Xiaoting Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01544
203
Citation mentions
85
Cited references
14
Sections
8,027
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Manski, C. F. 1993 13 5 21.0 0.064 1.000 100%
2 Bramoulle, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin 2009 6 3 10.0 0.030 1.000 100%
3 Dale, S. B. and A. B. Krueger 2002 5 3 7.0 0.025 1.000 100%
4 Brock, W. A. and S. N. Durlauf 2001 8 5 13.0 0.039 1.000 100%
5 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2005 5 3 9.0 0.025 1.000 100%
6 Azevedo, E. M. and J. D. Leshno 2016 12 4 20.5 0.059 0.971 92%
7 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2011 4 3 6.0 0.020 0.928 100%
8 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2007 4 3 6.0 0.020 0.928 100%
9 He, Y., S. Sinha, and X. Sun (self) 2024 10 6 15.0 0.049 0.928 80%
10 Ioannides, Y. M. and J. E. Zabel 2008 4 3 7.0 0.020 0.928 100%
11 Lee, A. J. 1990 6 4 8.0 0.030 0.874 67%
12 Heckman, J. J. 1979 5 2 9.0 0.025 0.874 100%
13 Das, M., W. K. Newey, and F. Vella 2003 6 2 10.0 0.030 0.874 100%
14 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2002 3 3 5.0 0.015 0.843 100%
15 Gu, X., H. Li, Z. Lin, and X. Tang 2024 3 3 5.0 0.015 0.843 100%
16 Moffitt, R. A. 2001 4 2 5.0 0.020 0.811 100%
17 Sacerdote, B. 2001 3 2 4.0 0.015 0.737 100%
18 Altonji, J. G. and R. L. Matzkin 2005 3 2 5.0 0.015 0.737 100%
19 Johnsson, I. and H. R. Moon 2021 4 3 4.0 0.020 0.737 50%
20 Li, Q. and J. S. Racine 2007 5 3 5.5 0.025 0.737 40%
21 Jochmans, K. 2023 3 2 6.0 0.015 0.737 100%
22 Barseghyan, L., M. Coughlin, F. Molinari, and J. C... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
23 Agarwal, N. and P. Somaini 2022 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
24 Altonji, J. G. and R. K. Mansfield 2018 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
25 Dahl, G. B. 2002 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
26 Abdulkadiro\uglu, A., P. A. Pathak, J. Schellenber... 2020 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
27 Robinson, P. M. 1988 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
28 Graham, B. S. 2008 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
29 Davezies, L., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and D. Foug\`ere 2009 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
30 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2002 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
31 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2021 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
32 Duflo, E., P. Dupas, and M. Kremer 2011 2 1 2.0 0.010 0.511 100%
33 Epple, D. and R. E. Romano 2011 2 1 2.0 0.010 0.511 100%
34 Auerbach, E. 2022 2 2 1.5 0.010 0.511 50%
35 Gandhi, A. and J.-F. Houde 2019 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
36 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2009 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
37 Newey, W. K. 1994 3 2 3.0 0.015 0.511 33%
38 Hahn, J. and G. Ridder 2013 5 2 4.0 0.025 0.511 20%
39 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2017 2 2 2.5 0.010 0.511 50%
40 Su, C.-L. and K. L. Judd 2012 2 2 2.5 0.010 0.511 50%
41 Evans, W. N., W. E. Oates, and R. M. Schwab 1992 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Katz, L. F., J. R. Kling, and J. B. Liebman 2001 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Bayer, P., S. L. Ross, and G. Topa 2008 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Zimmerman, D. J. 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Kirkeboen, L. J., E. Leuven, and M. Mogstad 2016 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Abdulkadiro\uglu, A., J. D. Angrist, Y. Narita, an... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Abdulkadiro\uglu, A., J. D. Angrist, Y. Narita, an... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Angrist, J., P. Hull, P. A. Pathak, and C. Walters 2024 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Gazmuri, A. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Roth, A. E. 1984 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Agarwal, N. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Gandhi, A. 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. and G. W. Imbens 2013 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Qu, X. and L.-f. Lee 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Hsieh, C.-S. and L. F. Lee 2016 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Hsieh, C.-S. and H. Van Kippersluis 2018 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Hsieh, C.-S., L.-F. Lee, and V. Boucher 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Griffith, A. 2024 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Patacchini, E., E. Rainone, and Y. Zenou 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Roth, A. E. and M. Sotomayor 1992 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Choo, E. and A. Siow 2006 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Menzel, K. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Fack, G., J. Grenet, and Y. He 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Galichon, A. and B. Salanie 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Fox, J. T., C. Yang, and D. H. Hsu 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Weyl, H. 1946 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Cosslett, S. R. 1991 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Blume, L. E., W. A. Brock, S. N. Durlauf, and Y. M... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Lee, L.-F. 1995 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Sun, X. (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Leung, M. P. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Ridder, G. and S. Sheng (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Leung, M. P. and H. R. Moon 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Gale, D. and L. Shapley 1962 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
75 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Ammermueller, A. and J.-S. Pischke 2009 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Valenzuela, J. P., V. Lopez, C. Allende, S. Ortiz,... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
78 Lleras-Muney, A., M. Miller, S. Sheng, and V. Sove... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Abdulkadiro\uglu, A., J. Angrist, and P. Pathak 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Dobbie, W. and R. G. Fryer Jr 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Train, K. E. 2009 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
82 Aitchison, J. and S. Silvey 1958 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
83 Wooldridge, J. M. 2010 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
84 Andrews, D. W. 1994 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
85 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1997 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.