← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\vspace-0.1 in
Alex Maynard, Katsumi Shimotsu, Nina Kuriyama
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00296
165
Citation mentions
58
Cited references
10
Sections
5,807
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Campbell, J. Y. and Yogo, M 2006 10 4 16.0 0.061 1.000 100%
2 Maynard, A., Shimotsu, K., and Wang, Y (self) 2011 8 5 13.0 0.048 1.000 100%
3 Xiao, Z 2009 10 5 18.0 0.061 1.000 100%
4 Lee, J. H 2016 14 8 24.0 0.085 1.000 100%
5 Fan, R. and Lee, J. H 2019 6 4 9.0 0.036 1.000 100%
6 Cai, Z., Chen, H., and Liao, X 2023 17 5 28.0 0.103 1.000 100%
7 --- 2014 10 6 17.0 0.061 1.000 100%
8 Hansen, B. E 1992 11 5 22.0 0.067 1.000 100%
9 Stock, J. H 1991 4 4 7.0 0.024 0.928 100%
10 Goyal, A. and Welch, I 2008 6 2 11.0 0.036 0.874 100%
11 Elliott, G., Muller, U. K., and Watson, M 2015 5 2 8.0 0.030 0.874 100%
12 Cenesizoglu, T. and Timmermann, A 2008 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
13 --- 2006 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
14 Cavanagh, C. L., Elliott, G., and Stock, J. H 1995 4 2 5.0 0.024 0.811 100%
15 Knight, K 1989 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
16 Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. S 1978 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
17 Hjalmarsson, E 2007 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
18 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
19 Gungor, S. and Luger, R 2019 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
20 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
21 Bickel, P. J 1975 3 1 6.0 0.018 0.585 100%
22 --- 1999 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
23 Shiller, R 1984 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
24 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
25 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
26 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
27 Hodrick, R 1992 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
28 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Stambaugh, R. F 1986 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Phillips, P. C. B. and Magdalinos, T 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Kostakis, A., Magdalinos, T., and Stamatogiannis, ... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Jansson, M. and Moreira, M. J 2006 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Cai, Z. and Wang, Y 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Lewellen, J 2004 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 --- 2011 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 --- 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Linton, O. and Whang, Y. J 2007 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Han, H., Linton, O., Oka, T., and Whang, Y.-J 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Lee, J. H., Linton, O., and Whang, Y.-J 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Chen, X., Koenker, R., and Xiao, Z 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Engle, R. and Manganelli, S 2004 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Gourieroux, C. and Jasiak, J 2008 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Koenker, R. and Xiao, Z 2004 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Galvao, A. F 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Cho, J. S., Kim, T., and Shin, Y 2015 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Carrasco, M. and Chen, X 2002 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Phillips, P. C. B 1989 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 --- 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Galvao, A. F. and Yoon, J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Silverman, B. W 1986 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Corsi, F 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Andrews, D. W. K 1991 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Pollard, D 1991 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.