← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

%\normalfont% Impulse Response Analysis of Structural Nonlinear Time Series Models
Giovanni Ballarin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19089
167
Citation mentions
64
Cited references
13
Sections
8,825
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Gon\c calves, S., Herrera, A. M., Kilian, L., and ... 2021 22 12 40.0 0.132 0.969 91%
2 Kilian, L. and Lutkepohl, H 2017 4 3 6.0 0.024 0.928 100%
3 Lutkepohl, H 2005 6 5 8.0 0.036 0.874 67%
4 Tenreyro, S. and Thwaites, G 2016 6 2 10.0 0.036 0.874 100%
5 Istrefi, K. and Mouabbi, S 2018 6 2 11.0 0.036 0.874 100%
6 Gon\c calves, S., Herrera, A. M., Kilian, L., and ... 2024a 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
7 Forni, M., Gambetti, L., Maffei-Faccioli, N., and ... 2023a 3 2 5.0 0.018 0.737 100%
8 Debortoli, D., Forni, M., Gambetti, L., and Sala, ... 2020 3 2 5.0 0.018 0.737 100%
9 Gon\c calves, S., Herrera, A. M., Kilian, L., and ... 2024b 3 2 4.0 0.018 0.737 100%
10 Wu, W. B 2005 4 4 4.0 0.024 0.737 50%
11 Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., an... 2015 4 3 4.0 0.024 0.737 50%
12 Chen, X. and Christensen, T. M 2015 24 10 23.0 0.144 0.693 33%
13 Forni, M., Gambetti, L., and Sala, L 2023b 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
14 Kilian, L. and Vigfusson, R. J 2011 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
15 Chen, X. and White, H 1999 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
16 Kohler, M., Krzy\.zak, A., and Walk, H 2009 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
17 Chen, X 2007 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
18 Wu, W. B 2011 4 3 3.5 0.024 0.585 25%
19 Jorda, O 2005 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
20 Chen, X 2013 2 2 2.5 0.012 0.511 50%
21 Wu, W. B., Huang, Y., and Huang, Y 2010 2 2 2.5 0.012 0.511 50%
22 Huang, J. Z 2003 2 2 2.5 0.012 0.511 50%
23 Kang, B 2021 2 2 1.5 0.012 0.511 50%
24 Chen, X., Shao, Q.-M., Wu, W. B., and Xu, L 2016 8 3 5.5 0.048 0.500 12%
25 Sims, C. A 1980 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
26 Hamilton, J. D 1994b 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
27 Plagborg-M\oller, M. and Wolf, C. K 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
28 Caggiano, G., Castelnuovo, E., and Figueres, J. M 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Pellegrino, G 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Caggiano, G., Castelnuovo, E., and Pellegrino, G 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Gambetti, L., Maffei-Faccioli, N., and Zoi, S 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Auerbach, A. J. and Gorodnichenko, Y 2012 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Caggiano, G., Castelnuovo, E., Colombo, V., and No... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Ramey, V. A. and Zubairy, S 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Sirotko-Sibirskaya, N., Franz, M. O., and Dickhaus... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Movahedifar, M. and Dickhaus, T 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Plagborg-M\oller, M 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Barnichon, R. and Brownlees, C 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Gourieroux, C. and Lee, Q 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Koop, G., Pesaran, M. H., and Potter, S. M 1996 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Potter, S. M 2000 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Gourieroux, C. and Jasiak, J 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Terasvirta, T., Tj\ostheim, D., and Granger, C. W.... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Kanazawa, N 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Fan, J. and Yao, Q 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Shen, X., Jiang, C., Sakhanenko, L., and Lu, Q 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Hamilton, J. D 1994a 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Kohler, M., Krzy\.zak, A., and Walk, H 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Kohler, M. and Krzy\.zak, A 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Zhou, X 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Hansen, B. E 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Li, Q. and Racine, J. S 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Karunamuni, R. J. and Alberts, T 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Malec, P. and Schienle, M 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Berry, T. and Sauer, T 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Mitrovic, D. and Zubrinic, D 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Stein, E. M. and Shakarchi, R 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Li, J. and Liao, Z 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Farrell, M. H., Liang, T., and Misra, S 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Potscher, B. M. and Prucha, I 1997 6 3 3.0 0.036 0.215 0%
62 Feng, B. Q 2003 2 2 1.0 0.012 0.139 0%
63 Tropp, J. A 2012 2 1 1.0 0.012 0.110 0%
64 Horn, R. A. and Johnson, C. R 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.