Citation Analysis

Dynamic LATEs with a Static Instrument
Bruno Ferman, Otávio Tecchio
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18114
51
Citation mentions
38
Cited references
7
Sections
4,102
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Angrist, Joshua and Ferman, Bruno and Gao, Carol a... (self) 2024 5 4 8.0 0.098 1.000 100%
2 Brantly Callaway and Pedro H.C. Sant’Anna 2021 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
3 Liyang Sun and Sarah Abraham 2021 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
4 Susan Athey and Guido W. Imbens 2022 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
5 Borusyak, Kirill and Jaravel, Xavier and Spiess, J... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
6 Blandhol, Christine and Bonney, John and Mogstad, ... 2022 2 2 2.0 0.039 0.644 100%
7 Lundborg, Petter and Plug, Erik and Rasmussen, Ast... 2017 2 1 2.0 0.039 0.511 100%
8 Miquel, Ruth 2002 2 1 2.0 0.039 0.511 100%
9 Guido W. Imbens and Joshua D. Angrist 1994 2 1 4.0 0.039 0.511 100%
10 Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila and Angrist, Joshua D. and H... 2016 2 1 4.0 0.039 0.511 100%
11 Schochet, Peter Z. and Burghardt, John and McConne... 2008 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
12 Alzúa, María Laura and Cruces, Guillermo and Lopez... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
13 Hirshleifer, Sarojini and McKenzie, David and Alme... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
14 Narayan Das 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
15 Stephen G. Bronars and Jeff Grogger 1994 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
16 Angelov, Nikolay and Karimi, Arizo 2012 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
17 Silles, Mary A. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
18 Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens 1995 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
19 Angrist, Joshua D. and Graddy, Kathryn and Imbens,... 2000 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
20 Torgovitsky, Alexander 2015 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
21 D'Haultfœuille, Xavier and Fe 2015 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
22 Masten, Matthew A. and Torgovitsky, Alexander 2016 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
23 Caetano, Carolina and Escanciano, Juan Carlos 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
24 Hull, Peter 2018 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
25 de Chaisemartin 2017 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
26 Hudson, Sally and Hull, Peter and Liebersohn, Jack 2017 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
27 Picchetti, Pedro and Pinto, Cristine 2024 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
28 de Chaisemartin 2020 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
29 Andrew Goodman-Bacon 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
30 Michal Kolesa 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
31 S\l 2022 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
32 Cellini, Stephanie Riegg and Ferreira, Fernando an... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
33 Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens and Donald B... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
34 Atila Abdulkadiroğlu and Angrist, Joshua and Dynar... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
35 Dobbie, Will and Fryer, Roland G., Jr. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
36 Gleason, Philip and Clark, Melissa and Tuttle, Chr... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
37 Angrist, Joshua D. and Cohodes, Sarah R. and Dynar... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
38 Bruno Ferman and Otávio Tecchio (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.