Citation Analysis

\textbfIdentification and Estimation of Production Function with Unobserved Heterogeneity
Hiroyuki Kasahara, Paul Schrimpf, Michio Suzuki
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.12067
106
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
11
Sections
10,832
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Doraszelski, U. and Jaumandreu, J 2018 6 3 7.0 0.057 1.000 100%
2 Kasahara, H. and Shimotsu, K (self) 2009 7 4 10.5 0.066 0.950 86%
3 Hu, Y. and Shum, M 2012 6 3 9.5 0.057 0.941 83%
4 Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., and Frazer, G 2015 5 2 6.0 0.047 0.874 100%
5 Zhang, H 2019 5 2 5.0 0.047 0.874 100%
6 Higgins, A. and Jochmans, K 2021 4 3 4.5 0.038 0.843 75%
7 Raval, D 2023 4 2 4.0 0.038 0.811 100%
8 Demirer, M 2020 3 2 3.0 0.028 0.737 100%
9 Bond, S. and Sderbom, M 2005 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 Hao, Y. and Kasahara, H (self) 2022 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 Levine, M., Hunter, D. R., and Chauveau, D 2011 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Olley, G. S. and Pakes, A 1996 3 1 3.0 0.028 0.585 100%
13 Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A 2003 3 1 3.0 0.028 0.585 100%
14 Li, T. and Sasaki, Y 2017 3 1 3.0 0.028 0.585 100%
15 Balat, J., Brambilla, I., and Sasaki, Y 2019 3 1 3.0 0.028 0.585 100%
16 Wooldridge, J. M 2009 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
17 Gandhi, A., Navarro, S., and Rivers, D 2020 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
18 Marschak, J. and Andrews, W. H 1944 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
19 Cheng, X., Schorfheide, F., and SHao, P 2021 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
20 Carroll, R. J., Chen, X., and Hu, Y 2010 3 2 3.0 0.028 0.511 33%
21 Hartigan, J 1985 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
22 Chen, J. and Tan, X 2009 8 2 5.5 0.075 0.437 12%
23 Ackerberg, D., Benkard, C. L., Berry, S., and Pake... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Pavcnik, N 2002 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Kasahara, H. and Rodrigue, J (self) 2008 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Kasahara, H. and Lapham, B (self) 2013 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Hsieh, C.-T. and Klenow, P. J 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Hall, R. E 1988 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 De Loecker, J. and Warzynski, F 2012 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Chen, Y., Igami, M., Sawada, M., and Xiao, M 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Griliches, Z. and Mairesse, J 1998 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Van Biesebroeck, J 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Solow, R. M 1957 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Dewitte, R., Fuss, C., and Theodorakopoulos, A 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Bonhomme, S. and Manresa, E 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Arellano, M. and Bond, S 1991 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Blundell, R. and Bond, S 1998 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Blundell, R. and Bond, S 2000 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Kasahara, H. and Shimotsu, K (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Kasahara, H. and Shimotsu, K (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Kasahara, H. and Shimotsu, K (self) 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 White, H 1982 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Bonhomme, S., Jochmans, K., and Robin, J.-M 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Kasahara, H. and Sugita, Y (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Alexandrovich, G 2014 5 1 2.5 0.047 0.149 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.