Citation Analysis

\Large \textbfStatistical Estimation for Covariance Structures with Tail Estimates using Nodewise Quantile Predictive Regression Models
Christis Katsouris
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11282
94
Citation mentions
68
Cited references
8
Sections
4,970
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Caner, Mehmet and Medeiros, Marcelo and Vasconcelo... 2022 5 2 8.0 0.053 0.874 100%
2 Peralta, Gustavo and Zareei, Abalfazl 2016 4 2 6.0 0.043 0.811 100%
3 Ha 2016 3 2 4.0 0.032 0.737 100%
4 Katsouris, Christis (self) 2021 3 2 4.0 0.032 0.737 100%
5 Adrian, Tobias and Brunnermeier, Markus K 2016 3 2 5.0 0.032 0.737 100%
6 Billio, Monica and Getmansky, Mila and Lo, Andrew ... 2012 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
7 Diebold, Francis X and Yilmaz, Kamil 2012 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
8 Barigozzi, Matteo and Hallin, Marc 2017 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
9 Olmo, Jose 2021 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
10 Engelke, Sebastian and Hitz, Adrien S 2020 2 2 1.5 0.021 0.644 100%
11 Azadkia, Mona and Chatterjee, Sourav 2021 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
12 Guo, X and Tang, CY 2021 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
13 Katz, Leo 1953 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
14 Browne, Michael W 1984 2 1 1.0 0.021 0.511 100%
15 Negahban, Sahand and Oh, Sewoong and Shah, Devavra... 2017 2 1 1.0 0.021 0.511 100%
16 P. Bonacich 1972 2 1 4.0 0.021 0.511 100%
17 Sadler, Evan 2022 2 1 4.0 0.021 0.511 100%
18 Anufriev, Mikhail and Panchenko, Valentyn 2015 2 1 4.0 0.021 0.511 100%
19 Roverato, Alberto and Whittaker, Joe 1998 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Salgueiro, M Fa 2005 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Hong, Yongmiao and Liu, Yanhui and Wang, Shouyang 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Blasques, Francisco and Koopman, Siem Jan and Luca... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Barun\'\i 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Lin, Weidong and Olmo, Jose and Taamouti, Abderrah... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 White, Halbert and Kim, Tae-Hwan and Manganelli, S... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Fan, Jianqing and Liao, Yuan and Shi, Xiaofeng 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Callot, Laurent and Caner, Mehmet and O 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Ledoit, Olivier and Wolf, Michael 2012 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Gnecco, Nicola and Meinshausen, Nicolai and Peters... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Dombry, Cle 2016 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Brown, Robert L and Durbin, James and Evans, James... 1975 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Drton, Mathias and Kuriki, Satoshi and Hoff, Peter 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Dendramis, Yiannis and Giraitis, Liudas and Kapeta... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Aamari, Eddie and Arias-Castro, Ery and Berenfeld,... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
35 McGee, Richard and Olmo, Jose 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Ledoit, Olivier and Wolf, Michael and Zhao, Zhao 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Einmahl, John HJ and Li, Jun and Liu, Regina Y 2015 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Li, Zeng and Wang, Qinwen and Li, Runze 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Chang, Jinyuan and Cheng, Guanghui and Yao, Qiwei 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Liu, L and Zhang, D 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Chang, Jinyuan and Chen, Xiaohui and Wu, Mingcong 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Schenone, Pablo 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Roger Koenker and Zhijie Xiao 2002 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Newey, Whitney K and Powell, James L 1987 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Gonzalo, Jesu 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Markowitz, Harry 1956 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Sharpe, William F 1964 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Fishburn, Peter C 1977 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Jagannathan, Ravi and Ma, Tongshu 2003 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 H Markowitz 1952 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Bommier, Antoine and Kochov, Asen and Le Grand, Fr... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Janssen, Arnold and Pauls, Thorsten 2003 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Chao, Shih-Kang and Ha 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 Vargas Jr, Roger and Waldron, Abigail and Sharma, ... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Bonacich, Phillip 1987 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 Van Mieghem, Piet 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 Diebold, Francis X and Y\i 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
59 Gupta, Abhimanyu and Kokas, Sotirios and Michaelid... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
60 Hu 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
61 Davison, AC and Smith, PWF and Whittaker, J 1991 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
62 Yu, K-B 1991 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
63 Chang, Jinyuan and Qiu, Yumou and Yao, Qiwei and Z... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
64 He, Yi and Hou, Yanxi and Peng, Liang and Shen, Ha... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
65 Lee, Ji Hyung 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
66 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
67 Fan, Zhou and Johnstone, Iain M 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
68 Badreau, Marie and Pro\"\i 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.