Citation Analysis

Context-Dependent Heterogeneous Preferences: A Comment on Barseghyan and Molinari (2023) \bigskip
Matias D. Cattaneo, Xinwei Ma, Yusufcan Masatlioglu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10934

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

2,607

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Barseghyan and Molinari	2023	19	7	29.0	0.633	0.982	95%
2	Barseghyan, Molinari, and Thirkettle	2021	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
3	Cattaneo, Ma, Masatlioglu, and Suleymanov (self)	2020	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
4	Barseghyan, Coughlin, Molinari, and Teitelbaum	2021	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
5	Cattaneo, Cheung, Ma, and Masatlioglu (self)	2023	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
6	Camerer	1995	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
7	Camerer	1998	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
8	Markowitz	1952	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
9	Tversky and Kahneman	1992	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
10	MacCrimmon and Wehrung	1986	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
11	MacCrimmon and Wehrung	1990	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
12	Weber, Blais, and Betz	2002	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.