Citation Analysis

\bf Risk management in the use of published statistical results for policy decisions
Duncan Ermini Leaf
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03205
26
Citation mentions
20
Cited references
4
Sections
6,411
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Akerlof, G. A 1970 3 2 6.0 0.115 0.737 100%
2 Smaldino, P. E. and McElreath, R 2016 2 2 3.0 0.077 0.644 100%
3 Ioannidis, J. P. A 2005 2 1 4.0 0.077 0.511 100%
4 Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., and DasGupta, A 2001 2 1 4.0 0.077 0.511 100%
5 Flyvbjerg, B. and Bester, D. W 2021 2 1 4.0 0.077 0.511 100%
6 Altmejd, A., Dreber, A., Forsell, E., Huber, J., I... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
7 Gordon, M., Viganola, D., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Dr... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
8 Pratt, J. W 1964 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
9 Degtiar, I. and Rose, S 2023 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
10 Arrow, K 1985 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
11 Flyvbjerg, B 2008 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
12 Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A 1979 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
13 Lovallo, D. and Kahneman, D 2003 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
14 Bordley, R. F 2014 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
15 Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M. K., and Buhl, S. L 2005 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
16 Kepp, K. P., Aavitsland, P., Ballin, M., Balloux, ... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
17 Spence, M 1973 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
18 Salanie, B 2005 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
19 Osherovich, L 2011 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
20 Rosenblatt, M 2016 1 1 2.0 0.038 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.