← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2305.03134
Xuan Leng, Jiaming Mao, Yutao Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03134
144
Citation mentions
74
Cited references
8
Sections
12,633
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bester, C. A. and C. Hansen 2009 7 4 12.0 0.049 1.000 100%
2 Arellano, M. and J. Hahn 2016 15 5 28.0 0.104 1.000 100%
3 Fernandez-Val, I. and M. Weidner 2016 21 9 41.0 0.146 1.000 100%
4 Lu, X. and L. Su 2023 6 4 11.0 0.042 1.000 100%
5 Hahn, J. and W. Newey 2004 4 3 7.0 0.028 0.928 100%
6 Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans 2015 4 3 7.0 0.028 0.928 100%
7 Chamberlain, G 1980 3 3 5.0 0.021 0.843 100%
8 Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner 2011 4 2 7.0 0.028 0.811 100%
9 White, H 1982 3 2 6.0 0.021 0.737 100%
10 Angrist, J. D. and W. N. Evans 1998 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
11 Higgins, A. and K. Jochmans 2024 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
12 Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme 2009 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
13 Jochmans, K. and T. Otsu 2019 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
14 Charbonneau, K. B 2017 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
15 Keane, M. and T. Neal 2020 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
16 Dhaene, G. and Y. Sun (self) 2021 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
17 Hayashi, F 2000 3 1 6.0 0.021 0.585 100%
18 Newey, W. K. and D. McFadden 1994 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
19 Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner 2007 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
20 Miller, K. S 1981 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
21 Browning, M. and J. Carro 2007 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
22 Heckman, J. J 2001 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
23 Okui, R. and W. Wang 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
24 Su, L. and Q. Chen 2013 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
25 Blau, D. M. and P. K. Robins 1988 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Kleven, H., C. Landais, and J. E. Søgaard 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Silva, J. S. and S. Tenreyro 2006 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, an... 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Nevo, A 2001 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Arellano, M. and S. Bond 1991 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Lancaster, T 2002 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Woutersen, T 2002 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Li, H., B. G. Lindsay, and R. P. Waterman 2003 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Kim, M. S. and Y. Sun (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Bellio, R., I. Kosmidis, A. Salvan, and N. Sartori 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Moon, H. R. and M. Weidner 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Chen, M., I. Fernández-Val, and M. Weidner 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Bai, J 2009 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Fern\'andez-Val, I. and M. Weidner 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Robertson, D. and J. Symons 1992 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Pesaran, M. H. and R. Smith 1995 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Robinson, P. M 1989 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson 1996 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Hsiao, C 2014 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Pesaran, M. H 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Fernandez-Val, I. and J. Lee 2013 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Fernandez-Val, I., W. Y. Gao, Y. Liao, and F. Vell... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernández-Val, J. Hahn, and W... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Browning, M. and J. M. Carro 2014 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Browning, M. and J. M. Carro 2010 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Pace, L. and A. Salvan 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Cruz-Gonzalez, M., I. Fernández-Val, and M. Weidne... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Killingsworth, M. R. and J. J. Heckman 1986 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Blau, F. D. and L. M. Kahn 2007 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Mincer, J 1962 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Heath, R. and S. Jayachandran 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Connelly, R 1992 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
58 Greenwood, J., N. Guner, G. Kocharkov, and C. Sant... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 Fernandez, R 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 Nakamura, A. and M. Nakamura 1992 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 Aguero, J. M. and M. S. Marks 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
62 Kimmel, J 1998 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
63 Blundell, R., M. Costa Dias, C. Meghir, and J. Sha... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
64 Okui, R. and T. Yanagi 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
65 Hamilton, J. D 1994 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
66 Feng, C., H. Wang, T. Chen, and X. M. Tu 2014 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
67 Neyman, J. and E. L. Scott 1948 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
68 Galvao, A. F. and K. Kato 2016 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
69 Andrews, D. W 1991 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
70 Schumann, M 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
71 Chamberlain, G 1985 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
72 Honore, B. E. and E. Kyriazidou 2000 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
73 Honore, B. E. and M. Weidner 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
74 Dano, K., B. E. Honore, and M. Weidner 2025 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.