Citation Analysis – \textbfCommon Correlated Effects Estimation of Nonlinear Panel Data Models

\textbfCommon Correlated Effects Estimation of Nonlinear Panel Data Models
Liang Chen, Minyuan Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13199

104

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,474

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Hahn, J. and W. Newey	2004	6	4	11.0	0.058	1.000	100%
2	Chen, M., I. Fernandez-Val, and M. Weidner (self)	2021	14	7	26.0	0.135	1.000	100%
3	Chen, L (self)	2022	6	4	12.0	0.058	1.000	100%
4	Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans	2015	4	3	7.0	0.038	0.928	100%
5	Fernández-Val, I. and M. Weidner	2016	3	3	6.0	0.029	0.843	100%
6	Bai, J	2009	4	2	6.0	0.038	0.811	100%
7	Boneva, L. and O. Linton	2017	4	2	5.0	0.038	0.811	100%
8	Ando, T., J. Bai, and K. Li	2022	4	2	6.0	0.038	0.811	100%
9	Gao, J., F. Liu, B. Peng, and Y. Yan	2023	4	2	6.0	0.038	0.811	100%
10	Pesaran, M. H	2006	3	2	4.0	0.029	0.737	100%
11	Moon, H. R. and M. Weidner	2015	3	2	5.0	0.029	0.737	100%
12	Chen, M (self)	2016	3	2	4.0	0.029	0.737	100%
13	Karabiyik, H., S. Reese, and J. Westerlund	2017	3	2	5.0	0.029	0.737	100%
14	Ma, Y	2019	8	1	16.0	0.077	0.693	100%
15	Ahn, S. C. and A. R. Horenstein	2013	2	2	4.0	0.019	0.644	100%
16	Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner	2011	2	2	4.0	0.019	0.644	100%
17	Galvao, A. F. and K. Kato	2016	2	2	4.0	0.019	0.644	100%
18	Dong, M., D. Hirshleifer, and S. H. Teoh		2	1	4.0	0.019	0.511	100%
19	Manski, C. F	1987	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
20	Honore, B. E. and E. Kyriazidou	2000	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
21	Honore, B. E. and A. Lewbel	2002	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
22	Chamberlain, G	2010	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
23	Davezies, L., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and M. Mugnier	2020	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
24	Honore, B. E. and M. Weidner	2020	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
25	Khan, S., M. Ponomareva, and E. Tamer	2020	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
26	Zhu, Y	2022	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
27	Neyman, J. and E. L. Scott	1948	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
28	Chudik, A. and H. Pesaran	2015	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
29	Wang, F	2022	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
30	Andrews, D. W	2005	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
31	Bai, J	2003	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
32	Newey, W. K. and K. D. West	1987	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
33	Baker, M. and J. Wurgler	2000	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
34	Baker, M., R. Greenwood, and J. Wurgler	2003	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
35	Hong, H., J. Wang, and J. Yu	2008	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
36	Andersen, E. B	1970	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
37	Rio, E	2017	7	1	3.5	0.067	0.149	0%
38	Rosenthal, H. P	1970	1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
39	Bradley, R. C	2005	1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Hahn, J. and W. Newey

2004

11.0

0.058

1.000

100%

Chen, M., I. Fernandez-Val, and M. Weidner (self)

2021

26.0

0.135

1.000

100%

Chen, L (self)

2022

12.0

0.058

1.000

100%

Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans

2015

7.0

0.038

0.928

100%

Fernández-Val, I. and M. Weidner

2016

6.0

0.029

0.843

100%

Bai, J

2009

6.0

0.038

0.811

100%

Boneva, L. and O. Linton

2017

5.0

0.038

0.811

100%

Ando, T., J. Bai, and K. Li

2022

6.0

0.038

0.811

100%

Gao, J., F. Liu, B. Peng, and Y. Yan

2023

6.0

0.038

0.811

100%

Pesaran, M. H

2006

4.0

0.029

0.737

100%

Moon, H. R. and M. Weidner

2015

5.0

0.029

0.737

100%

Chen, M (self)

2016

4.0

0.029

0.737

100%

Karabiyik, H., S. Reese, and J. Westerlund

2017

5.0

0.029

0.737

100%

Ma, Y

2019

16.0

0.077

0.693

100%

Ahn, S. C. and A. R. Horenstein

2013

4.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner

2011

4.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Galvao, A. F. and K. Kato

2016

4.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Dong, M., D. Hirshleifer, and S. H. Teoh

4.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Manski, C. F

1987

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Honore, B. E. and E. Kyriazidou

2000

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Honore, B. E. and A. Lewbel

2002

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Chamberlain, G

2010

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Davezies, L., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and M. Mugnier

2020

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Honore, B. E. and M. Weidner

2020

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Khan, S., M. Ponomareva, and E. Tamer

2020

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Zhu, Y

2022

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Neyman, J. and E. L. Scott

1948

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Chudik, A. and H. Pesaran

2015

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Wang, F

2022

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. W

2005

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bai, J

2003

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Newey, W. K. and K. D. West

1987

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Baker, M. and J. Wurgler

2000

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Baker, M., R. Greenwood, and J. Wurgler

2003

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Hong, H., J. Wang, and J. Yu

2008

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Andersen, E. B

1970

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Rio, E

2017

3.5

0.067

0.149

Rosenthal, H. P

1970

0.5

0.010

0.087

Bradley, R. C

2005

0.5

0.010

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.