Citation Analysis

$\ell_1$ Penalized Likelihood Inference with Survey Data
Joann Jasiak, Purevdorj Tuvaandorj
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07855
103
Citation mentions
31
Cited references
10
Sections
2,654
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 8 3 15.0 0.078 1.000 100%
2 8 3 14.0 0.078 1.000 100%
3 5 2 10.0 0.049 0.874 100%
4 8 2 16.0 0.078 0.874 100%
5 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
6 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
7 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
8 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
9 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 3 2 4.5 0.029 0.644 67%
12 10 2 9.5 0.097 0.585 30%
13 7 2 6.5 0.068 0.575 29%
14 6 4 4.5 0.058 0.550 17%
15 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
16 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.511 50%
17 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
18 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
19 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 13 2 8.0 0.126 0.371 8%
27 2 1 1.0 0.019 0.110 0%
28 2 1 1.0 0.019 0.110 0%
29 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
30 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
31 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.