Citation Analysis – Individual Welfare Analysis: Random Quasilinear Utility, Independence, and Confidence Bounds

Individual Welfare Analysis: Random Quasilinear Utility, Independence, and Confidence Bounds
Junlong Feng, Sokbae Lee
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01921

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

11,154

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Shi, H., M. Drton, and F. Han	2022	5	4	6.5	0.089	0.928	80%
2	Chatterjee, S	2021	6	5	8.5	0.107	0.874	67%
3	Brown, D. J., R. Deb, and M. H. Wegkamp	2007	3	2	4.0	0.054	0.737	100%
4	Brown, D. J. and C. Calsamiglia	2007	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
5	Hoeffding, W	1948	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
6	Blum, J., J. Kiefer, and M. Rosenblatt	1961	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
7	Bergsma, W. and A. Dassios	2014	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
8	Yanagimoto, T	1970	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
9	Echenique, F., S. Lee, and M. Shum (self)	2011	2	2	4.0	0.036	0.644	100%
10	Montiel Olea, J. L. and M. Plagborg-M\oller	2019	2	1	4.0	0.036	0.511	100%
11	Chatterjee, S	2008	4	2	3.5	0.071	0.511	25%
12	Fu, A., B. Narasimhan, and S. Boyd	2020	2	2	2.5	0.036	0.511	50%
13	Blundell, R., J. Horowitz, and M. Parey	2017	2	1	4.0	0.036	0.511	100%
14	Dube, J.-P	2019	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
15	Manski, C. F	1983	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
16	Brown, D. J. and M. H. Wegkamp	2002	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
17	Komunjer, I. and A. Santos	2010	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
18	Poirier, A	2017	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
19	Torgovitsky, A	2017	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
20	Griffith, R., L. Nesheim, and M. O'Connell	2018	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
21	Allen, R. and J. Rehbeck	2019	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
22	Chatterjee, S. and S. Holmes	2020	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
23	Even-Zohar, C	2020	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
24	Dubois, P., R. Griffith, and A. Nevo	2014	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
25	Allcott, H., R. Diamond, J.-P. Dube, J. Handbury, ...	2019	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
26	Angus, J. E	1995	2	1	1.0	0.036	0.110	0%
27	Zhang, Q	2023	2	1	1.0	0.036	0.110	0%
28	Diamond, S. and S. Boyd	2016	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.087	0%
29	Smirnov, N. V	1944	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.087	0%
30	Chung, K.-L	1949	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.087	0%
31	McDiarmid, C	1989	1	1	0.5	0.018	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Shi, H., M. Drton, and F. Han

2022

6.5

0.089

0.928

80%

Chatterjee, S

2021

8.5

0.107

0.874

67%

Brown, D. J., R. Deb, and M. H. Wegkamp

2007

4.0

0.054

0.737

100%

Brown, D. J. and C. Calsamiglia

2007

3.0

0.036

0.644

100%

Hoeffding, W

1948

3.0

0.036

0.644

100%

Blum, J., J. Kiefer, and M. Rosenblatt

1961

3.0

0.036

0.644

100%

Bergsma, W. and A. Dassios

2014

3.0

0.036

0.644

100%

Yanagimoto, T

1970

3.0

0.036

0.644

100%

Echenique, F., S. Lee, and M. Shum (self)

2011

4.0

0.036

0.644

100%

Montiel Olea, J. L. and M. Plagborg-M\oller

2019

4.0

0.036

0.511

100%

Chatterjee, S

2008

3.5

0.071

0.511

25%

Fu, A., B. Narasimhan, and S. Boyd

2020

2.5

0.036

0.511

50%

Blundell, R., J. Horowitz, and M. Parey

2017

4.0

0.036

0.511

100%

Dube, J.-P

2019

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F

1983

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Brown, D. J. and M. H. Wegkamp

2002

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Komunjer, I. and A. Santos

2010

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Poirier, A

2017

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Torgovitsky, A

2017

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Griffith, R., L. Nesheim, and M. O'Connell

2018

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Allen, R. and J. Rehbeck

2019

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Chatterjee, S. and S. Holmes

2020

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Even-Zohar, C

2020

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Dubois, P., R. Griffith, and A. Nevo

2014

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Allcott, H., R. Diamond, J.-P. Dube, J. Handbury, ...

2019

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Angus, J. E

1995

1.0

0.036

0.110

Zhang, Q

2023

1.0

0.036

0.110

Diamond, S. and S. Boyd

2016

0.5

0.018

0.087

Smirnov, N. V

1944

0.5

0.018

0.087

Chung, K.-L

1949

0.5

0.018

0.087

McDiarmid, C

1989

0.5

0.018

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.