Citation Analysis – \LARGE On the failure of the bootstrap for Chatterjee's rank correlation

\LARGE On the failure of the bootstrap for Chatterjee's rank correlation
Zhexiao Lin, Fang Han
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14088

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,253

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Lin, Z. and Han, F (self)	2022	8	4	12.0	0.098	0.957	88%
2	Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W	2008	3	3	5.0	0.037	0.843	100%
3	Chatterjee, S	2021	3	2	4.0	0.037	0.737	100%
4	Bickel, P. J. and Freedman, D. A	1981	3	2	5.0	0.037	0.737	100%
5	Shao, J. and Tu, D	1995	2	2	4.0	0.024	0.644	100%
6	Drton, M. and Williams, B	2011	2	2	4.0	0.024	0.644	100%
7	Fang, Z. and Santos, A	2019	2	2	4.0	0.024	0.644	100%
8	Beran, R	1997	2	2	4.0	0.024	0.644	100%
9	Samworth, R	2003	2	2	4.0	0.024	0.644	100%
10	Bickel, P. J	2022	2	1	2.0	0.024	0.511	100%
11	Arcones, M. A. and Gine, E	1992	2	1	4.0	0.024	0.511	100%
12	Spearman, C	1904	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
13	Spearman, C	1906	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
14	Kendall, M. G	1938	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
15	Kendall, M. G	1970	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
16	Hoeffding, W	1940	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
17	Hoeffding, W	1948	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
18	Hoeffding, W	1994	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
19	Blum, J. R., Kiefer, J., and Rosenblatt, M	1961	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
20	H\'ajek, J., \vSid\'ak, Z., and Sen, P. K	1999	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
21	Hodges, Jr., J. L. and Lehmann, E. L	1956	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
22	Chernoff, H. and Savage, I. R	1958	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
23	Dette, H., Siburg, K. F., and Stoimenov, P. A	2013	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
24	R\'enyi, A	1959	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
25	Bergsma, W. and Dassios, A	2014	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
26	Yanagimoto, T	1970	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
27	Azadkia, M. and Chatterjee, S	2021	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
28	Cao, S. and Bickel, P. J	2020	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
29	Shi, H., Drton, M., and Han, F (self)	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
30	Gamboa, F., Gremaud, P., Klein, T., and Lagnoux, A	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
31	Deb, N., Ghosal, P., and Sen, B	2020	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
32	Huang, Z., Deb, N., and Sen, B	2020	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
33	Auddy, A., Deb, N., and Nandy, S	2021	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
34	Shi, H., Drton, M., and Han, F (self)	2023	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
35	Lin, Z. and Han, F (self)	2023	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
36	Fuchs, S	2023	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
37	Azadkia, M., Taeb, A., and Buhlmann, P	2021	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
38	Griessenberger, F., Junker, R. R., and Trutschnig,...	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
39	Strothmann, C., Dette, H., and Siburg, K. F	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
40	Zhang, Q	2023b	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
41	Holma, A	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
42	Chatterjee, S. and Vidyasagar, M	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
43	Han, F. and Huang, Z (self)	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
44	Ansari, J. and Fuchs, S	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
45	Zhang, Q	2023a	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
46	Han, F (self)	2021	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
47	Chatterjee, S	2022	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
48	Efron, B	1979	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
49	Efron, B	1981	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
50	Beran, R	1982	1	1	1.0	0.012	0.406	100%
51	Mammen, E	1991	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
52	Athreya, K	1987	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
53	Knight, K	1989	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
54	Hall, P	1990	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
55	Beran, R. and Srivastava, M. S	1985	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
56	Hall, P., Hardle, W., and Simar, L	1993	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
57	Andrews, D. W	2000	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
58	Abrevaya, J. and Huang, J	2005	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
59	Kosorok, M. R	2008	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
60	Sen, B., Banerjee, M., and Woodroofe, M	2010	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
61	Bretagnolle, J	1983	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%
62	Dumbgen, L	1993	1	1	2.0	0.012	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Lin, Z. and Han, F (self)

2022

12.0

0.098

0.957

88%

Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W

2008

5.0

0.037

0.843

100%

Chatterjee, S

2021

4.0

0.037

0.737

100%

Bickel, P. J. and Freedman, D. A

1981

5.0

0.037

0.737

100%

Shao, J. and Tu, D

1995

4.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Drton, M. and Williams, B

2011

4.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Fang, Z. and Santos, A

2019

4.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Beran, R

1997

4.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Samworth, R

2003

4.0

0.024

0.644

100%

Bickel, P. J

2022

2.0

0.024

0.511

100%

Arcones, M. A. and Gine, E

1992

4.0

0.024

0.511

100%

Spearman, C

1904

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Spearman, C

1906

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Kendall, M. G

1938

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Kendall, M. G

1970

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hoeffding, W

1940

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hoeffding, W

1948

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hoeffding, W

1994

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Blum, J. R., Kiefer, J., and Rosenblatt, M

1961

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

H\'ajek, J., \vSid\'ak, Z., and Sen, P. K

1999

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hodges, Jr., J. L. and Lehmann, E. L

1956

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Chernoff, H. and Savage, I. R

1958

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Dette, H., Siburg, K. F., and Stoimenov, P. A

2013

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

R\'enyi, A

1959

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Bergsma, W. and Dassios, A

2014

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Yanagimoto, T

1970

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Azadkia, M. and Chatterjee, S

2021

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Cao, S. and Bickel, P. J

2020

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Shi, H., Drton, M., and Han, F (self)

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Gamboa, F., Gremaud, P., Klein, T., and Lagnoux, A

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Deb, N., Ghosal, P., and Sen, B

2020

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Huang, Z., Deb, N., and Sen, B

2020

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Auddy, A., Deb, N., and Nandy, S

2021

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Shi, H., Drton, M., and Han, F (self)

2023

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Lin, Z. and Han, F (self)

2023

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Fuchs, S

2023

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Azadkia, M., Taeb, A., and Buhlmann, P

2021

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Griessenberger, F., Junker, R. R., and Trutschnig,...

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Strothmann, C., Dette, H., and Siburg, K. F

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Zhang, Q

2023b

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Holma, A

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Chatterjee, S. and Vidyasagar, M

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Han, F. and Huang, Z (self)

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Ansari, J. and Fuchs, S

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Zhang, Q

2023a

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Han, F (self)

2021

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Chatterjee, S

2022

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Efron, B

1979

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Efron, B

1981

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Beran, R

1982

1.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Mammen, E

1991

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Athreya, K

1987

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Knight, K

1989

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hall, P

1990

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Beran, R. and Srivastava, M. S

1985

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Hall, P., Hardle, W., and Simar, L

1993

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. W

2000

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Abrevaya, J. and Huang, J

2005

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Kosorok, M. R

2008

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Sen, B., Banerjee, M., and Woodroofe, M

2010

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Bretagnolle, J

1983

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Dumbgen, L

1993

2.0

0.012

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.