Citation Analysis

Standard Errors When a Regressor is Randomly Assigned
Denis Chetverikov, Jinyong Hahn, Zhipeng Liao, Andres Santos
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10306

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

3,920

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Moulton	1986	5	4	9.0	0.167	1.000	100%
2	Liang and Zeger	1986	3	3	6.0	0.100	0.843	100%
3	Abadie, Athey, Imbens, and Wooldridge	2017	3	1	3.0	0.100	0.585	100%
4	Barrios, Diamond, Imbens, and Kolesar	2012	2	1	2.0	0.067	0.511	100%
5	Bloom	2005	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
6	Duflo, Glennerster, and Kremer	2007	1	1	1.0	0.033	0.406	100%
7	Newey and West	1987	1	1	2.0	0.033	0.406	100%
8	Andrews	1991	1	1	2.0	0.033	0.406	100%
9	Arellano	1987	1	1	2.0	0.033	0.406	100%
10	Hansen	2007	1	1	2.0	0.033	0.406	100%
11	Ibragimov and Muller	2010	1	1	2.0	0.033	0.406	100%
12	Ibragimov and Muller	2016	1	1	2.0	0.033	0.406	100%
13	Conley	1999	1	1	2.0	0.033	0.406	100%
14			2	1	2.0	0.067	0.110	0%
15	DasGupta	2008	2	1	1.0	0.067	0.110	0%
16	Hall and Heyde	1980	2	1	1.0	0.067	0.110	0%
17	White	2014	2	1	1.0	0.067	0.110	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.