← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Identification- and Many Moment-Robust Inference via Invariant Moment Conditions
Tom Boot, Johannes W. Ligtenberg
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07822
163
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
10
Sections
7,561
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kleibergen, F 2005 8 3 11.0 0.049 1.000 100%
2 Hausman, J. A., Newey, W. K., Woutersen, T., Chao,... 2012 8 5 15.0 0.049 1.000 100%
3 Mikusheva, A. and Sun, L 2022 5 3 8.0 0.031 1.000 100%
4 Matsushita, Y. and Otsu, T 2022 5 3 7.0 0.031 1.000 100%
5 Chao, J. C., Swanson, N. R., Hausman, J. A., Newey... 2012 11 5 21.0 0.067 1.000 100%
6 Honore, B. E 1992 24 5 46.0 0.147 1.000 100%
7 Chernozhukov, V., Hansen, C., and Jansson, M 2009 13 6 24.0 0.080 1.000 100%
8 Chernozhukov, V., Hansen, C., and Jansson, M 2006 5 3 10.0 0.031 1.000 100%
9 Jun, S. J 2008 11 4 22.0 0.067 1.000 100%
10 Chernozhukov, V. and Hansen, C 2006 5 4 10.0 0.031 1.000 100%
11 Kaplan, D. M. and Sun, Y 2017 5 4 10.0 0.031 1.000 100%
12 Langfield, S. and Pagano, M 2016 9 2 16.0 0.055 0.874 100%
13 Crudu, F., Mellace, G., and Sandor, Z 2021 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
14 Ligtenberg, J. W (self) 2023 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
15 Billingsley, P 1995 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
16 Hansen, L. P., Heaton, J., and Yaron, A 1996 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
17 Bekker, P. A. and Crudu, F 2015 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
18 Andrews, D. W 1994 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
19 Arellano, M 2009 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
20 Whittle, P 1960 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
21 Ullah, A 2004 4 1 8.0 0.025 0.644 100%
22 Ghosal, S. and Chandra, T. K 1998 3 1 6.0 0.018 0.585 100%
23 Anderson, T. W. and Rubin, H 1949 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
24 Andrews, I 2016 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
25 Newey, W. K. and Windmeijer, F 2009 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
26 Bontemps, C. and Meddahi, N 2005 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
27 Bao, Y. and Ullah, A 2010 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
28 Moreira, M. J 2003 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Dov\`\i, M.-S., Kock, A. B., and Mavroeidis, S 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Lim, D., Wang, W., and Zhang, Y 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Han, C. and Phillips, P. C. B 2006 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Bekker, P. A 1994 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Efron, B 1969 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Bekker, P. A. and Lawford, S 2008 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Kleibergen, F 2002 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Newey, W. K 1990 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Angrist, J. D. and Evans, W. N 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Dupas, P., Karlan, D., Robinson, J., and Ubfal, D 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Dube, O. and Harish, S 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Anatolyev, S 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Anatolyev, S. and Gospodinov, N 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Bekker, P. A. and Kleibergen, F 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Doko Tchatoka, F. and Dufour, J.-M 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Frazier, D. T., Renault, E., Zhang, L., and Zhao, ... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Bai, Z. D., Miao, B. Q., and Pan, G. M 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.