Citation Analysis

\bf Personalized Pricing with Invalid Instrumental Variables: Identification, Estimation, and Policy Learning
Rui Miao, Zhengling Qi, Cong Shi, Lin Lin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12670
104
Citation mentions
60
Cited references
14
Sections
10,977
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ai, Chunrong and Xiaohong Chen 2003 5 5 8.5 0.048 1.000 100%
2 Chen, Xiaohong and Demian Pouzo 2012 8 5 16.0 0.077 1.000 100%
3 Kallus, Nathan and Angela Zhou 2018 5 4 10.0 0.048 1.000 100%
4 Ban, Gah-Yi and N Bora Keskin 2021 4 3 8.0 0.038 0.928 100%
5 Phillips, Robert, A Serdar \cSim\csek, and Garrett... 2015 3 3 6.0 0.029 0.843 100%
6 Blundell-Wignall, Adrian, Marianne Gizycki, et al. 1992 3 3 4.5 0.029 0.843 100%
7 Newey, Whitney K and James L Powell 2003 3 3 4.5 0.029 0.843 100%
8 Lewbel, Arthur 2012 3 2 2.0 0.029 0.737 100%
9 Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric, BaoLuo Sun, and Stefan Wa... 2021 3 2 2.0 0.029 0.737 100%
10 Wainwright, Martin J 2019 4 4 5.0 0.038 0.737 50%
11 Blundell, Richard, Xiaohong Chen, and Dennis Krist... 2007 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Chen, Guanhua, Donglin Zeng, and Michael R Kosorok 2016 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Hall, Peter and Joel L Horowitz 2005 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Chen, Xiaohong and Markus Reiss 2011 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Chen, Xiaohong and Timothy M Christensen 2018 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.644 100%
16 Darolles, Serge, Yanqin Fan, Jean-Pierre Florens, ... 2011 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.644 100%
17 Van der Vaart, Aad W 2000 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
18 Korostelev, Aleksandr Petrovich and Olga Korostele... 2011 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
19 Stone, Charles J 1982 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
20 Miao, Rui, Zhengling Qi, and Xiaoke Zhang (self) 2022 2 2 1.0 0.019 0.511 50%
21 Kang, Hyunseung, Anru Zhang, T Tony Cai, and Dylan... 2016 2 1 1.0 0.019 0.511 100%
22 Guo, Zijian, Hyunseung Kang, T Tony Cai, and Dylan... 2018 2 1 1.0 0.019 0.511 100%
23 Angrist, Joshua D and Alan B Keueger 1991 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Cutler, David M and Edward L Glaeser 1997 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Burgess, Stephen, Adam Butterworth, and Simon G Th... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Manski, Charles F 2004 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Qian, Min and Susan A Murphy 2011 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Dud\'\ik, Miroslav, John Langford, and Lihong Li 2011 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Zhao, Yingqi, Donglin Zeng, A John Rush, and Micha... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Kitagawa, Toru and Aleksey Tetenov 2018 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Cai, Hengrui, Chengchun Shi, Rui Song, and Wenbin ... (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Biggs, Max 2022 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Qi, Zhengling, Jingwen Tang, Ethan Fang, and Cong ... (self) 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Cui, Yifan and Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen 2021 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Qiu, Hongxiang, Marco Carone, Ekaterina Sadikova, ... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Han, Sukjin 2019 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Pu, Hongming and Bo Zhang 2020 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Stensrud, Mats J and Aaron L Sarvet 2022 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
39 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2020 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Qi, Zhengling, Rui Miao, and Xiaoke Zhang (self) 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Wang, Jiayi, Zhengling Qi, and Chengchun Shi (self) 2022 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Shen, Tao and Yifan Cui 2022 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Angrist, Joshua and Guido Imbens 1995 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Wang, Linbo and Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen 2018 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Staiger, Douglas O and James H Stock 1994 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Stock, James H and Jonathan H Wright 2000 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Stock, James H, Jonathan H Wright, and Motohiro Yo... 2002 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Chao, John C and Norman R Swanson 2005 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Newey, Whitney K and Frank Windmeijer 2009 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Sun, Baoluo, Zhonghua Liu, and Eric Tchetgen Tchet... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Kolesar, Michal, Raj Chetty, John Friedman, Edward... 2015 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
52 Windmeijer, Frank, Helmut Farbmacher, Neil Davies,... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.406 100%
53 Angrist, Joshua D, Guido W Imbens, and Donald B Ru... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
54 Chernozhukov, Victor, Guido W Imbens, and Whitney ... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
55 Bastani, Hamsa, David Simchi-Levi, and Ruihao Zhu 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
56 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
57 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
58 Dikkala, Nishanth, Greg Lewis, Lester Mackey, and ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
59 Bennett, Andrew and Nathan Kallus 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
60 Foster, Dylan J and Vasilis Syrgkanis 2019 2 1 1.0 0.019 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.