← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Individualized Treatment Allocation in Sequential Network Games
Toru Kitagawa, Guanyi Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05747
132
Citation mentions
77
Cited references
8
Sections
10,537
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Mele, Angelo 2017 8 4 8.5 0.061 1.000 100%
2 Wainwright, Martin J and Jordan, Michael I and oth... 2008 8 6 12.5 0.061 1.000 100%
3 13 8 22.0 0.098 0.974 92%
4 Nakajima, Ryo 2007 4 3 6.0 0.030 0.928 100%
5 Snijders, Tom AB and others 2002 4 3 6.0 0.030 0.928 100%
6 Monderer, Dov and Shapley, Lloyd S 1996 5 2 8.5 0.038 0.874 100%
7 Chatterjee, Sourav and Dembo, Amir 2016 3 3 4.5 0.023 0.843 100%
8 Ballester, Coralio and Calvo 2006 3 2 3.0 0.023 0.737 100%
9 Akbarpour, Mohammad and Malladi, Suraj and Saberi,... 2025 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
10 Kitagawa, Toru and Wang, Guanyi (self) 2023 2 2 1.5 0.015 0.644 100%
11 Jackson, Matthew O and Watts, Alison 2002 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
12 Christakis, Nicholas and Fowler, James and Imbens,... 2020 2 2 1.5 0.015 0.644 100%
13 Geyer, Charles J and Thompson, Elizabeth A 1992 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
14 Chatterjee, Sourav and Diaconis, Persi 2013 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
15 Boucher, Vincent and Mourifie 2017 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
16 Wang, Guanyi (self) 2024 2 2 1.5 0.015 0.644 100%
17 Rosenthal, Robert W 1973 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.644 100%
18 Badev, Anton 2021 2 2 1.5 0.015 0.644 100%
19 Galeotti, Andrea and Golub, Benjamin and Goyal, Sa... 2020 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.644 100%
20 Besag, Julian 1974 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
21 Go 2019 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
22 Gozlan, Nathael and Roberto, Cyril and Samson, Pau... 2017 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
23 Bian, Andrew An and Buhmann, Joachim M and Krause,... 2017 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
24 Bramoulle 2007 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Galeotti, Andrea and Rogers, Brian W 2013 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Geman, Stuart and Geman, Donald 1984 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Mele, Angelo and Zhu, Lingjiong 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Kakade, Sham and Kearns, Michael and Langford, Joh... 2003 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Roughgarden, Tim 2010 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Kearns, Michael and Littman, Michael L and Singh, ... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Babichenko, Yakov and Tamuz, Omer 2016 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
32 De Paula, A 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Leung, Michael P 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Parise, Francesca and Asuman, Ozdaglar 2023 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Kashaev, Nail and Lazzati, Natalia and Xiao, Ruli 2023 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Manski, Charles F 2004 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Dehejia, Rajeev H 2005 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Stoye, Jo 2009 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Stoye, Jo 2012 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Hirano, Keisuke and Porter, Jack R 2009 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Hirano, Keisuke and Porter, Jack R 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Chamberlain, Gary 2011 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Chamberlain, Gary 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Tetenov, Aleksey 2012 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Christensen, Timothy and Moon, Hyungsik Roger and ... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Kitagawa, Toru and Tetenov, Aleksey (self) 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Kasy, Maximilian and Sautmann, Anja 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Toru Kitagawa and Shosei Sakaguchi and Aleksey Tet... (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Mbakop, Eric and Tabord-Meehan, Max 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Sun, Liyang 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Adjaho, Christopher and Christensen, Timothy 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
53 Viviano, Davide 2025 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
54 Ananth, Abhishek 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
55 Munro, Evan and Wager, Stefan and Xu, Kuang 2023 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
56 Kitagawa, Toru and Lopez, Hugo and Rowley, Jeff (self) 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
57 Richardson, Matthew and Domingos, Pedro 2002 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
58 Lee, Lung-Fei and Liu, Xiaodong and Patacchini, El... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
59 Jackson, Matthew O 2010 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
60 Bramoulle 2014 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
61 Chandrasekhar, Arun G and Jackson, Matthew O 2014 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
62 Blume, Lawrence E 1993 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
63 Lee, Robin S and Pakes, Ariel 2009 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
64 Hsieh, Chih-Sheng and Lee, Lung-Fei and Boucher, V... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
65 Bre 2013 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
66 Hammersley, JM and Clifford, P 1971 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
67 De Paula, A 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
68 Dobrushin, Roland L 1970 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
69 Joseph, Resch and Mark, S. Handcock 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
70 Leung, Michael P 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
71 Kojevnikov, Denis and Marmer, Vadim and Song, Kyun... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
72 Beaman, Lori and BenYishay, Ariel and Magruder, Je... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
73 Andrews, Isaiah and Kitagawa, Toru and McCloskey, ... (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
74 Lewbel, Arthur and Qu, Xi and Tang, Xun 2025 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
75 Adamczak, Rados\l 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
76 Sudakov, Vladimir N and Tsirel'son, Boris S 1978 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
77 Gozlan, Nathael 2009 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.