← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Approximate Functional Differencing
Geert Dhaene, Martin Weidner
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13736
78
Citation mentions
43
Cited references
11
Sections
9,200
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bonhomme, S 2012 12 9 20.0 0.154 0.971 92%
2 Honore, B. E. and M. Weidner (self) 2020 4 3 7.0 0.051 0.928 100%
3 Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans (self) 2015b 3 3 5.0 0.038 0.843 100%
4 Neyman, J. and E. L. Scott 1948 3 3 4.0 0.038 0.737 67%
5 Hahn, J. and W. Newey 2004 3 3 4.0 0.038 0.737 67%
6 Rasch, G 1960 3 2 5.0 0.038 0.737 100%
7 Honore, B. E. and E. T. Tamer 2006 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
8 Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme 2009 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
9 Bonhomme, S. and E. Manresa 2015 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
10 Arellano, M. and J. Hahn 2016 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
11 Honore, B. E 1992 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
12 Hu, L 2002 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
13 Johnson, E. G 2004 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
14 Kitazawa, Y 2013 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
15 Honore, B. E., C. Muris, and M. Weidner (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
16 Davezies, L., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and M. Mugnier 2022 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
17 Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans (self) 2015a 2 2 4.0 0.026 0.644 100%
18 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernandez-Val, J. Hahn, and W... 2013 2 2 4.0 0.026 0.644 100%
19 Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner 2002 2 2 2.0 0.026 0.511 50%
20 Arellano, M 2003 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme 2011 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Lancaster, T 2000 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Moreira, M. J 2009 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Lancaster, T 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Arellano, M. and S. Bond 1991 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Chamberlain, G 2010 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Alvarez, J. and M. Arellano 2003 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Fernandez-Val, I. and M. Weidner (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Hansen, L. P 1982 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Andersen, E. B 1970 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Chamberlain, G 1980 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Dobronyi, C., J. Gu, and K. i. Kim 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Arellano, M. and J. Hahn 2007 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Bonhomme, S. and M. Weidner (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 Horn, R. A. and C. R. Johnson 1994 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 Su, L., Z. Shi, and P. C. Phillips 2016 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 Bonhomme, S., T. Lamadon, and E. Manresa 2022 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
38 Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme 2012 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
39 Aguirregabiria, V. and J. M. Carro 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
40 Davezies, L., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and L. Laage 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
41 Liu, L., A. Poirier, and J.-L. Shiu 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
42 Pakel, C. and M. Weidner (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
43 Bonhomme, S. and L. Davezies 2017 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.