← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbfNonlinearities in Macroeconomic Tail Risk through the Lens of Big Data Quantile Regressions
Jan Prüser, Florian Huber
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13604
93
Citation mentions
64
Cited references
6
Sections
5,004
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Carriero, Andrea and Clark, Todd E and Marcellino,... 2022 5 3 10.0 0.054 1.000 100%
2 Diebold, F. X. and Mariano, R.S. 1995 5 3 10.0 0.054 1.000 100%
3 Adrian, Tobias and Boyarchenko, Nina and Giannone,... 2019 4 4 6.0 0.043 0.928 100%
4 Mitchell, James and Poon, Aubrey and Mazzi, Gian L... 2022 4 3 6.0 0.043 0.928 100%
5 Harvey, D. and Leybourne, S. and Newbold, P. 1997 4 3 8.0 0.043 0.928 100%
6 Todd E. Clark and Florian Huber and Gary Koop and ... (self) 2022 3 3 5.0 0.032 0.843 100%
7 Kohns, David and Szendrei, Tibor 2021 3 3 5.0 0.032 0.843 100%
8 Griffin, Jim E and Brown, Philip J 2010 3 3 6.0 0.032 0.843 100%
9 Pfarrhofer, Michael 2022 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 Shin, Minsuk and Bhattacharya, Anirban and Johnson... 2020 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
11 Blei, David M and Kucukelbir, Alp and McAuliffe, J... 2017 2 2 2.0 0.022 0.644 100%
12 Michael W. McCracken and Serena Ng 2016 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
13 Huber, Florian and Koop, Gary and Onorante, Luca a... (self) 2023 2 1 2.0 0.022 0.511 100%
14 Gneiting, Tilmann and Ranjan, Roopesh 2011 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
15 Adrian, Tobias and Grinberg, Federico and Liang, N... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Ferrara, Laurent and Mogliani, M. and Sahuc, J.G. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Gloria Gonzalez-Rivera and Javier Maldonado and Es... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Delle Monache, Davide and De Polis, Andrea and Pet... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Plagborg-M\o 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Reichlin, Lucrezia and Ricco, Giovanni and Hasenza... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Figueres, Juan Manuel and Jaroci\'n 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Adams, Patrick A and Adrian, Tobias and Boyarchenk... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 D'Agostino, Antonello and Gambetti, Luca and Giann... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Carriero, Andrea and Clark, Todd E. 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Adrian, Tobias and Boyarchenko, Nina and Giannone,... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Williams, Christopher KI and Rasmussen, Carl Edwar... 2006 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Guo Bufrei 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Koenker, Roger and Bassett, Gilbert 1978 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani, Robert 1987 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Yu, Keming and Moyeed, Rana A 2001 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Kozumi, Hideo and Kobayashi, Genya 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 West, Mike 1987 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Polson, Nicholas G and Scott, James G 2010 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Huber, Florian and Feldkircher, Martin (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Cross, Jamie L and Hou, Chenghan and Poon, Aubrey 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Chan, Joshua CC 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Jan Pruser 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Carvalho, Carlos M and Polson, Nicholas G and Scot... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Ghosh, P. and Tang, X. and Ghosh, M. and Chakrabar... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Armagan, A. Dunson, D. and Bajwa, W. and Lee, J. a... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 van der Pas, S. and Kleijn, B. and van der Vaart, ... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Bhattacharya, A. and Pati, D. and Pillai, N. and D... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Bai, Jushan and Ng, Serena 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 De Boor, C. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Arin, C. and Kakde, D. and Sadek, C. and Gonzalez,... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Polson, Nicholas G and Sokolov, Vadim 2017 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Gefang, Deborah and Koop, Gary and Poon, Aubrey 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Chan, Joshua CC and Yu, Xuewen 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Koop, Gary and Korobilis, Dimitris 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Korobilis, Dimitris and Schro 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Frazier, D.T. and Loaiza-Maya, R. and Martin, G.M. 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Wand, Matthew P and Ormerod, John T and Padoan, Si... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Clark, Todd E and Huber, Florian and Koop, Gary an... (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Woody, Spencer and Carvalho, Carlos M and Murray, ... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 Hahn, P Richard and Carvalho, Carlos M 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Ray, Pallavi and Bhattacharya, Anirban 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 Huber, Florian and Koop, Gary and Onorante, Luca (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 Hauzenberger, Niko and Huber, Florian and Onorante... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
59 Giannone, Domenico and Lenza, Michele and Primicer... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
60 Ghysels, Eric and Sinko, Arthur and Valkanov, Ross... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
61 Foroni, Claudia and Marcellino, Massimiliano and S... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
62 Korobilis, Dimitris and Landau, Bettina and Musso,... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
63 Koop, Gary and Korobilis, Dimitris 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
64 Hauzenberger, Niko and Huber, Florian and Koop, Ga... (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.