Citation Analysis – Composite distributions in the social sciences: A comparative empirical study of firms' sales distribution for France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, and Spain

Citation Analysis

Composite distributions in the social sciences: A comparative empirical study of firms' sales distribution for France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, and Spain
Arturo Ramos, Till Massing, Atushi Ishikawa, Shouji Fujimoto, Takayuki Mizuno
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09438

113

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,148

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	McLachlan, G. and Peel, D.	2003	5	4	8.0	0.044	1.000	100%
2	Pena, G. and Puente-Ajov\'\in, M. and Ramos, A. an... (self)		5	3	8.0	0.044	1.000	100%
3	Fiori, A. M.		3	2	6.0	0.027	0.737	100%
4	Belmonte, A. and Di Clemente, R. and Buldyrev, S. ...		2	2	2.0	0.018	0.644	100%
5	Kuninaka, H.		2	2	2.0	0.018	0.644	100%
6	Puente-Ajov\'\in, M. and Ramos, A. and Sanz-Gracia... (self)		2	2	3.0	0.018	0.644	100%
7	Ramos, A. (self)		2	2	4.0	0.018	0.644	100%
8	Campolieti, M. and Ramos, A. (self)		2	2	3.0	0.018	0.644	100%
9	Gabaix, X.		3	1	3.0	0.027	0.585	100%
10	Gabaix, X.		3	1	3.0	0.027	0.585	100%
11	Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R.		3	1	6.0	0.027	0.585	100%
12	Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R.		3	1	6.0	0.027	0.585	100%
13	Gibrat, R.	1931	2	1	2.0	0.018	0.511	100%
14	Ord, J. K.		2	1	2.0	0.018	0.511	100%
15	Gardiner, C. W.		2	1	2.0	0.018	0.511	100%
16	It\^o, K. and McKean Jr. , H. P.		2	1	2.0	0.018	0.511	100%
17	Kyprianou, A. E.		2	1	2.0	0.018	0.511	100%
18	Dupire, B.	1993	2	1	2.0	0.018	0.511	100%
19	Dupire, B.		2	1	2.0	0.018	0.511	100%
20	Massing, T. and Puente-Ajov\'\in, M. and Ramos, A. (self)	2020	2	1	4.0	0.018	0.511	100%
21	Massing, T. and Ramos, A. (self)	2021	2	1	4.0	0.018	0.511	100%
22	Pareto, V.	1896	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
23	Singer, H. W.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
24	Zipf, G. K.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
25	Parr, J. B.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
26	Simon, H. A. and Bonini, C. P.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
27	Quandt, R. E.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
28	Clarke, R.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
29	Cabral, L. M. B. and Mata, J.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
30	Parr, J. B.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
31	Eeckhout, J.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
32	Perline, R.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
33	Clauset, A. and Shalizi, C. R. and Newman, E. J.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
34	Bee, M. and Riccaboni, M. and Schiavo, S.	2011	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
35	Bee, M. and Riccaboni, M. and Schiavo, S.	2013	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
36	Bee, M.	2015	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
37	Bee, M. and Riccaboni, M. and Schiavo, S.	2017	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
38	Chu, J. and Dickin, O. and Nadarajah, S.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
39	Schluter, Ch. and Trede, M.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
40	Bee, M.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
41	Charpentier, A. and Flachaire, E.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
42	Gonzalez-Val, R. and Ramos, A. and Sanz-Gracia, F. (self)	2014	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
43	Puente-Ajov\'\in, M.	2015	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
44	Ramos, A. and Sanz-Gracia, F. (self)		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
45	Ramos, A. (self)	2017	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
46	Harrison, J.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
47	Otunuga, O. M.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
48	Gikhman, I. I. and Skorokhod, A. V.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
49	Reed, W. J.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
50	Reed, W. J.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
51	Reed, W. J. and Jorgensen, M.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
52	Manas, A.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
53	Giesen, K. and Zimmermann, A. and Suedekum, J.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
54	McDonald, J. B.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
55	McDonald, J. B. and Xu, Y. J.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
56	Kleiber, C. and Kotz, S.	2003	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
57	Cortes, L. M. and Mora-Valencia, A. and Perote, J.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
58	Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
59	Schluter, Ch. and Trede, M.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
60	Kiefer, N. M.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
61	Basford, K. E. and McLachlan, G. J.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
62	Newey, W. K. and McFadden, D. L.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
63	Casella, G. and Berger, R. L.	2002	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
64	Atienza, N. and Garc\'\ia-Heras, J. and Mu\ noz-Pi...		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
65	Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
66	Efron, B. and Hinkley, D. V.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
67	McCullough, B. D. and Vinod, H. D.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
68	Kolmogorov, A. N.	1933	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
69	Cramer, H.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
70			1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
71	Anderson, T.W. and Darling, D.A.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
72	Akaike, H.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
73	Schwarz, G. E.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
74	Hannan, E. J. and Quinn, B. G.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
75	Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N.		1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
76	Kwong, H. S. and Nadarajah, S.	2019	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
77	B\va	2019	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
78	Gualandi, S. and Toscani, G.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
79	Gualandi, S. and Toscani, G.		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
80	Su, H.-L.	2019	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
81	Puente-Ajov\'\in, M. and Ramos, A. and Sanz-Gracia... (self)		1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

McLachlan, G. and Peel, D.

2003

8.0

0.044

1.000

100%

Pena, G. and Puente-Ajov\'\in, M. and Ramos, A. an... (self)

8.0

0.044

1.000

100%

Fiori, A. M.

6.0

0.027

0.737

100%

Belmonte, A. and Di Clemente, R. and Buldyrev, S. ...

2.0

0.018

0.644

100%

Kuninaka, H.

2.0

0.018

0.644

100%

Puente-Ajov\'\in, M. and Ramos, A. and Sanz-Gracia... (self)

3.0

0.018

0.644

100%

Ramos, A. (self)

4.0

0.018

0.644

100%

Campolieti, M. and Ramos, A. (self)

3.0

0.018

0.644

100%

Gabaix, X.

3.0

0.027

0.585

100%

Gabaix, X.

3.0

0.027

0.585

100%

Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R.

6.0

0.027

0.585

100%

Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R.

6.0

0.027

0.585

100%

Gibrat, R.

1931

2.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Ord, J. K.

2.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Gardiner, C. W.

2.0

0.018

0.511

100%

It\^o, K. and McKean Jr. , H. P.

2.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Kyprianou, A. E.

2.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Dupire, B.

1993

2.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Dupire, B.

2.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Massing, T. and Puente-Ajov\'\in, M. and Ramos, A. (self)

2020

4.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Massing, T. and Ramos, A. (self)

2021

4.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Pareto, V.

1896

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Singer, H. W.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Zipf, G. K.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Parr, J. B.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Simon, H. A. and Bonini, C. P.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Quandt, R. E.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Clarke, R.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Cabral, L. M. B. and Mata, J.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Parr, J. B.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Eeckhout, J.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Perline, R.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Clauset, A. and Shalizi, C. R. and Newman, E. J.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Bee, M. and Riccaboni, M. and Schiavo, S.

2011

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Bee, M. and Riccaboni, M. and Schiavo, S.

2013

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Bee, M.

2015

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Bee, M. and Riccaboni, M. and Schiavo, S.

2017

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Chu, J. and Dickin, O. and Nadarajah, S.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Schluter, Ch. and Trede, M.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Bee, M.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Charpentier, A. and Flachaire, E.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Gonzalez-Val, R. and Ramos, A. and Sanz-Gracia, F. (self)

2014

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Puente-Ajov\'\in, M.

2015

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Ramos, A. and Sanz-Gracia, F. (self)

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Ramos, A. (self)

2017

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Harrison, J.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Otunuga, O. M.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Gikhman, I. I. and Skorokhod, A. V.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Reed, W. J.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Reed, W. J.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Reed, W. J. and Jorgensen, M.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Manas, A.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Giesen, K. and Zimmermann, A. and Suedekum, J.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

McDonald, J. B.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

McDonald, J. B. and Xu, Y. J.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Kleiber, C. and Kotz, S.

2003

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Cortes, L. M. and Mora-Valencia, A. and Perote, J.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Schluter, Ch. and Trede, M.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Kiefer, N. M.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Basford, K. E. and McLachlan, G. J.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Newey, W. K. and McFadden, D. L.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Casella, G. and Berger, R. L.

2002

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Atienza, N. and Garc\'\ia-Heras, J. and Mu\ noz-Pi...

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Efron, B. and Hinkley, D. V.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

McCullough, B. D. and Vinod, H. D.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Kolmogorov, A. N.

1933

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Cramer, H.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Anderson, T.W. and Darling, D.A.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Akaike, H.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Schwarz, G. E.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Hannan, E. J. and Quinn, B. G.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N.

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Kwong, H. S. and Nadarajah, S.

2019

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

B\va

2019

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Gualandi, S. and Toscani, G.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Gualandi, S. and Toscani, G.

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Su, H.-L.

2019

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Puente-Ajov\'\in, M. and Ramos, A. and Sanz-Gracia... (self)

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.