← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

From prosumer to flexumer: Case study on the value of flexibility in decarbonizing the multi-energy system of a manufacturing company
Markus Fleschutz, Markus Bohlayer, Marco Braun, Michael D. Murphy
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07997
68
Citation mentions
57
Cited references
13
Sections
5,489
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 I. Petkov, P. Gabrielli, Power-to-hydrogen as seas... 2020 6 3 10.5 0.088 1.000 100%
2 ENTSO-E, \hrefhttps://transparency.entsoe.euENTSO-... 2022 3 2 6.0 0.044 0.737 100%
3 Y. Jee, E. Lee, K. Baek, W. Ko, J. Kim, Data-Analy... 2022 2 2 2.5 0.029 0.644 100%
4 M. Fleschutz, M. Bohlayer, M. Braun, M. D. Murphy,... (self) 2022 3 1 6.0 0.044 0.585 100%
5 M. Fleschutz, M. Murphy, elmada: Dynamic electrici... (self) 2021 2 1 4.0 0.029 0.511 100%
6 European Commission, \hrefhttps://ec.europa.eu/inf... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
7 United Nations Environment Programme, \hrefhttps:/... 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
8 A. W. Mortensen, B. V. Mathiesen, A. B. Hansen, S.... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
9 J. Rissman, C. Bataille, E. Masanet, N. Aden, W. R... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
10 F. Knobloch, S. Hanssen, A. Lam, H. Pollitt, P. Sa... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
11 A. Arteconi, D. Patteeuw, K. Bruninx, E. Delarue, ... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
12 IEA, \hrefhttps://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
13 P. Mancarella, MES (multi-energy systems): An over... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
14 D. Papadaskalopoulos, R. Moreira, G. Strbac, D. Pu... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
15 J. Mays, Missing incentives for flexibility in who... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
16 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
17 F. Sensfu\ss, M. Ragwitz, M. Genoese, The merit-or... 2008 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
18 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
19 H. U. Buhl, Industrial fexibility options and thei... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
20 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
21 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
22 R. Li, A. J. Satchwell, D. Finn, T. H. Christensen... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
23 N. Lashmar, B. Wade, L. Molyneaux, P. Ashworth, En... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
24 T. Muche, C. Hoge, O. Renner, R. Pohl, Profitabili... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
25 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
26 M. T. Kelley, R. C. Pattison, R. Baldick, M. Balde... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
27 S. Scholz, F. Meisel, Coordination of heterogeneou... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
28 D. L. Summerbell, D. Khripko, C. Barlow, J. Hessel... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
29 T. M. Alabi, L. Lu, Z. Yang, A novel multi-objecti... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
30 A. Ahmarinejad, A Multi-objective Optimization Fra... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
31 S. A. Mansouri, A. Ahmarinejad, F. Sheidaei, M. S.... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
32 M. R. Cremi, A. M. Pantaleo, K. H. van Dam, N. Sha... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
33 N. Baumgartner, R. Delorme, M. Hennen, A. Bardow, ... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
34 A. R. Jordehi, Optimisation of demand response in ... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
35 Z. Luo, J. Peng, J. Cao, R. Yin, B. Zou, Y. Tan, J... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
36 L. Zhang, N. Good, P. Mancarella, Building-to-grid... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
37 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
38 M. Joung, J. Kim, Assessing demand response and sm... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
39 L. Hirth, The optimal share of variable renewables... 2015 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
40 W. Zappa, M. Junginger, M. van den Broek, Can libe... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
41 C. Yang, B. He, H. Liao, J. Ruan, J. Zhao, Price-b... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
42 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
43 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
44 M. Fleschutz, M. Bohlayer, M. Braun, G. Henze, M. ... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
45 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
46 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
47 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
48 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
49 E. Vartiainen, G. Masson, C. Breyer, D. Moser, E. ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
50 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
51 J. Figgener, P. Stenzel, K.-P. Kairies, J. Lin\sse... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
52 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
53 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
54 M. Bohlayer, G. Zottl, Low-grade waste heat integr... (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
55 C. Plumley, Kelmarsh wind farm data 2022 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
56 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
57 M. Fasihi, O. Efimova, C. Breyer, Techno-economic ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.