← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Optimal Transport for Counterfactual Estimation:\\A Method for Causal Inference
Arthur Charpentier, Emmanuel Flachaire, Ewen Gallic
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07755
53
Citation mentions
44
Cited references
7
Sections
8,342
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Pearl, Judea and Mackenzie, Dana 2018 3 3 6.0 0.057 0.843 100%
2 Brualdi, Richard A 2006 2 2 4.0 0.038 0.644 100%
3 Kantorovich, Leonid V 1942 2 2 4.0 0.038 0.644 100%
4 Villani, Ce 2003 2 2 4.0 0.038 0.644 100%
5 Herna 2006 3 1 6.0 0.057 0.585 100%
6 Villani, Ce 2009 2 1 4.0 0.038 0.511 100%
7 Galichon, Alfred 2016 2 1 4.0 0.038 0.511 100%
8 Donald B. Rubin 1974 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
9 Herna 2010 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
10 Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, Donald B 2015 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
11 Imai, Kosuke 2018 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
12 Morgan, Stephen L and Winship, Christopher 2014 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
13 Cunningham, Scott 2021 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
14 Arthur Charpentier (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
15 Hahn, Jinyong 1998 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
16 Heckman, James J and Ichimura, Hidehiko and Todd, ... 1998 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
17 Hitsch, Gu 2018 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
18 Powers, Scott and Qian, Junyang and Jung, Kenneth ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
19 Fan, Qingliang and Hsu, Yu-Chin and Lieli, Robert ... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
20 Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan 2018 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
21 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2019 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
22 Athey, Susan and Tibshirani, Julie and Wager, Stef... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
23 Davis, Jonathan and Heller, Sara B 2017 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
24 Ku 2019 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
25 Hsu, Yu-Chin and Lai, Tsung-Chih and Lieli, Robert... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
26 Rosenbaum, Paul R and Rubin, Donald B 1983 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
27 Mach, Ernst 1893 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
28 Chisholm, Roderick M 1946 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
29 Goodman, Nelson 1947 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
30 Vowels, Matthew J and Camgoz, Necati Cihan and Bow... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
31 Abrevaya, Jason and Hsu, Yu-Chin and Lieli, Robert... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
32 Li, Fan and Morgan, Kari Lock and Zaslavsky, Alan ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
33 Wilcox, Allen J 1993 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
34 Wilcox, Allen J 2001 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
35 Rubin, Donald B 1973 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
36 Stuart, Elizabeth A 2010 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
37 Ho, Daniel E and Imai, Kosuke and King, Gary and S... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
38 Dehejia, Rajeev H and Wahba, Sadek 1999 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
39 Santambrogio, Filippo 2015 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
40 Monge, Gaspard 1781 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
41 Brenier, Yann 1991 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
42 McCann, Robert J 1999 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
43 Hallin, Marc and Del Barrio, Eustasio and Cuesta-A... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
44 Higham, Nicholas J 2008 1 1 2.0 0.019 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.