← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

When it counts - Econometric identification of the basic factor model based on GLT structures
Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter, Darjus Hosszejni, Hedibert Freitas Lopes
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06354
90
Citation mentions
43
Cited references
9
Sections
10,432
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Reiers\ol, O 1950 5 3 9.0 0.056 1.000 100%
2 Anderson, T. W. and H. Rubin 1956 11 4 21.0 0.122 1.000 100%
3 Fruhwirth-Schnatter, S., D. Hosszejni, and H. F. L... (self) 2022 8 4 14.0 0.089 1.000 100%
4 Tumura, Y. and M. Sato 1980 10 4 18.5 0.111 0.966 90%
5 Sato, M 1992 6 5 9.5 0.067 0.941 83%
6 Lopes, H. F. and M. West (self) 2004 3 2 4.0 0.033 0.737 100%
7 Conti, G., S. Fruhwirth-Schnatter, J. J. Heckman, ... 2014 3 2 6.0 0.033 0.737 100%
8 Geweke, J. F. and G. Zhou 1996 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
9 Fruhwirth-Schnatter, S. and H. Lopes (self) 2018 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 Ro\vckov\'a, V. and E. I. George 2017 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
11 Legramanti, S., D. Durante, and D. B. Dunson 2020 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
12 Kaufmann, S. and C. Schuhmacher 2019 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
13 Hosszejni, D. and S. Fruhwirth-Schnatter (self) 2022 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
14 J\"oreskog, K. G 1969 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
15 Fruhwirth-Schnatter, S 2022 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
16 Thurstone, L. L 1935 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Thurstone, L. L 1947 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Anderson, T. W 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Fan, J., Y. Fan, and J. Lv 2008 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Forni, M., D. Giannone, M. Lippi, and L. Reichlin 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Kastner, G 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Ledoit, O. and M. Wolf 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Owen, A. B. and J. Wang 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Koopmans, T. C. and O. Reiers\ol 1950 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 West, M 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Neudecker, H 1990 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Bai, J. and S. Ng 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 A\ssmann, C., J. Boysen-Hogrefe, and M. Pape 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Chan, J., R. Leon-Gonzalez, and R. W. Strachan 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Williams, B 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Bekker, P. A 1989 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Bai, J. and S. Ng 2002 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Bhattacharya, A. and D. Dunson 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Carvalho, C. M., J. Chang, J. E. Lucas, J. Nevins,... 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Hayashi, K. and G. A. Marcoulides 2006 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Anton, H. and C. Rorres 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Yuster, T 1984 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Geweke, J. F. and K. J. Singleton 1980 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Boivin, J. and S. Ng 2006 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Kaufmann, S. and C. Schuhmacher 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Ohn, I. and Y. Kim 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Teh, Y. W., D. G\"or\"ur, and Z. Ghahramani 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Zhao, S., C. Gao, S. Mukherjee, and B. E. Engelhar... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.