← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Unbiased estimation and asymptotically valid inference in multivariable Mendelian randomization with many weak instrumental variables
Yihe Yang, Noah Lorincz-Comi, Xiaofeng Zhu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.05130
106
Citation mentions
63
Cited references
8
Sections
11,487
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wang, Kai and Shi, Xian and Zhu, Ziwei and Hao, Xi... (self) 2022 8 3 15.0 0.075 1.000 100%
2 Burgess, Stephen and Thompson, Simon G and Crp Chd... 2011 5 3 7.0 0.047 1.000 100%
3 Zhao, Qingyuan and Wang, Jingshu and Hemani, Gibra... 2020 4 3 7.0 0.038 0.928 100%
4 Zhu, Xiaofeng (self) 2020 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
5 Verbanck, Marie and Chen, Chia-Yen and Neale, Benj... 2018 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
6 Morrison, Jean and Knoblauch, Nicholas and Marcus,... 2020 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
7 Ye, Ting and Shao, Jun and Kang, Hyunseung 2021 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
8 Yi, Grace Y 2017 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
9 Bowden, Jack and Davey Smith, George and Burgess, ... 2015 3 2 4.0 0.028 0.737 100%
10 Vershynin, Roman 2018 6 3 6.0 0.057 0.693 33%
11 MacArthur, Jacqueline and Bowler, Emily and Cerezo... 2017 2 2 2.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Sudlow, Cathie and Gallacher, John and Allen, Naom... 2015 2 2 2.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Zhu, Xiaofeng and Li, Xiaoyin and Xu, Rong and Wan... (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Bowden, Jack and Davey Smith, George and Haycock, ... 2016 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Cheng, Qing and Zhang, Xiao and Chen, Lin S and Li... 2022 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
16 Bulik-Sullivan, Brendan and Finucane, Hilary K and... 2015 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
17 Sanderson, Eleanor and Spiller, Wes and Bowden, Ja... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
18 Burgess, Stephen and Davies, Neil M and Thompson, ... 2016 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
19 Sadreev, Ildar I and Elsworth, Benjamin L and Mitc... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
20 Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group and ... 1994 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
21 Burgess, Stephen and Thompson, Simon G 2015 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
22 Zhu, Xiaofeng and Feng, Tao and Tayo, Bamidele O a... (self) 2015 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
23 Visscher, Peter M and Wray, Naomi R and Zhang, Qia... (self) 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Gresham, David and Dunham, Maitreya J and Botstein... 2008 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Klein, Robert J and Zeiss, Caroline and Chew, Emil... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Wijmenga, Cisca and Zhernakova, Alexandra 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Tam, Vivian and Patel, Nikunj and Turcotte, Michel... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Burgess, Stephen and Thompson, Simon G 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Ebrahim, Shah and Davey Smith, George 2008 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Rees, Jessica MB and Wood, Angela M and Dudbridge,... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Qi, Guanghao and Chatterjee, Nilanjan 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Burgess, Stephen and Foley, Christopher N and Alla... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Cheng, Qing and Qiu, Tingting and Chai, Xiaoran an... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Xue, Haoran and Shen, Xiaotong and Pan, Wei 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Schwarz, Gideon 1978 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Yuan, Zhongshang and Liu, Lu and Guo, Ping and Yan... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Rees, Jessica MB and Wood, Angela M and Burgess, S... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Grant, Andrew J and Burgess, Stephen 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Sanderson, Eleanor and Davey Smith, George and Win... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Stock, James H and Wright, Jonathan H and Yogo, Mo... 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Bulik-Sullivan, Brendan K and Loh, Po-Ru and Finuc... (self) 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Diggle, Peter and Diggle, Peter J and Heagerty, Pa... 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Zhu, Xiaofeng and Zhu, Luke and Wang, Heming and C... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Bickel, Peter J and Levina, Elizaveta 2008 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Hall, Peter 1992 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Van de Geer, Sara and Bu 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Jankova, Jana and Van De Geer, Sara 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Calonico, Sebastian and Cattaneo, Matias D and Far... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Turley, Patrick and Walters, Raymond K and Maghzia... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Liang, Kung-Yee and Zeger, Scott L 1986 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Benjamini, Yoav and Hochberg, Yosef 1995 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Yavorska, Olena O and Burgess, Stephen 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Murray, Megan Hollister and Blume, Jeffrey D 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Bujak, Kamil and Wasilewski, Jaroslaw and Osadnik,... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Yu, Wei and Cheng, Ji-Dong 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Gill, Dipender and Zuber, Verena and Dawson, Jesse... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Sorlie, Paul D and Garcia-Palmieri, Mario R and Co... 1981 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Lorincz-Comi, Noah and Yang, Yihe and Li, Gen and ... (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Fan, Jianqing and Liao, Yuan and Mincheva, Martina 2011 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
60 Vershynin, Roman 2010 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
61 Muirhead, Robb J 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
62 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
63 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.