Citation Analysis

Causality-preservation capabilities of data replication methods: an overview
Yves-Cédric Bauwelinckx, Jan Dhaene, Tim Verdonck, Milan van den Heuvel
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01109
74
Citation mentions
60
Cited references
7
Sections
10,674
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ian J. Goodfellow and Jean Pouget-Abadie and Mehdi... 2014 5 4 8.0 0.068 1.000 100%
2 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
3 Feng, Qianli and Guo, Chenqi and Benitez-Quiroz, F... 2022 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
4 Bernhard Scholkopf and Francesco Locatello and Ste... 2021 2 2 2.0 0.027 0.644 100%
5 Jinsung Yoon and Daniel Jarrett and Mihaela van de... 2019 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
6 Xu, Lei and Skoularidou, Maria and Cuesta-Infante,... 2019 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
7 Murat Kocaoglu and Christopher Snyder and Alexandr... 2017 2 2 4.0 0.027 0.644 100%
8 Wen, Bingyang and Colon, Luis and Subbalakshmi, K.... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.027 0.644 100%
9 Radford, Alec and Metz, Luke and Chintala, Soumith 2015 2 1 2.0 0.027 0.511 100%
10 van Breugel, Boris and Kyono, Trent and Berrevoets... 2021 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
11 Xu, Lei and Veeramachaneni, Kalyan 2018 2 1 4.0 0.027 0.511 100%
12 McKinsey & Company 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
13 European Commission 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
14 Gartner Research 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Castellanos, Sara 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Susan Athey 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Krizhevsky, Alex and Sutskever, Ilya and Hinton, G... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Tom B. Brown and Benjamin Mann and Nick Ryder and ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Evans, Lyndon R. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Davide Castelvecchi 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Koenecke, Allison and Varian, Hal 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Karras, Tero and Aila, Timo and Laine, Samuli and ... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Zhang, Han and Xu, Tao and Li, Hongsheng and Zhang... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Wu, Huikai and Zheng, Shuai and Zhang, Junge and H... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Ledig, Christian and Theis, Lucas and Huszar, Fere... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Pathak, Deepak and Krahenbuhl, Philipp and Donahue... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Yisroel Mirsky and Wenke Lee 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Beery, Sara and van Horn, Grant and Perona, Pietro 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Wiese, Magnus and Knobloch, Robert and Korn, Ralf ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Arjovsky, Martin and Chintala, Soumith and Bottou,... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido and Metzger, Jonas ... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Taleb, Nassim 2010 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Martin Arjovsky and Léon Bottou and Ishaan Gulraja... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Xun Zheng and Bryon Aragam and Pradeep Ravikumar a... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Vowels, Matthew J. and Camgoz, Necati Cihan and Bo... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Shohei Shimizu and Patrik O. Hoyer and Aapo Hyvrin... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Patrik O. Hoyer and Shohei Shimizu and Antti J. Ke... 2008 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Aapo Hyva 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Zhang, Kun and Hyv\"a 2009 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Ledig, Christian and Theis, Lucas and Huszar, Fere... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Andrew Brock and Jeff Donahue and Karen Simonyan 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Tero Karras and Samuli Laine and Miika Aittala and... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 Mohamed, Shakir and Lakshminarayanan, Balaji 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
44 Webster, Ryan and Rabin, Julien and Simon, Loic an... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
45 Hayes, Jamie and Melis, Luca and Danezis, George a... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
46 Dingfan Chen and Ning Yu and Yang Zhang and Mario ... 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
47 Lin, Zinan and Sekar, Vyas and Fanti, Giulia 2022 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
48 Xie, Liyang and Lin, Kaixiang and Wang, Shu and Wa... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
49 Yi Liu and Jialiang Peng and James J.Q. Yu and Yi ... 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
50 Chong Huang and Peter Kairouz and Xiao Chen and La... 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
51 Zinan Lin and Alankar Jain and Chen Wang and Giuli... 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
52 Kusner, Matt J and Loftus, Joshua and Russell, Chr... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
53 Zhang, Junzhe and Bareinboim, Elias 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
54 Xu, Depeng and Wu, Yongkai and Yuan, Shuhan and Zh... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
55 Xu, Depeng and Yuan, Shuhan and Zhang, Lu and Wu, ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
56 Sattigeri, Prasanna and Hoffman, Samuel C. and Che... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
57 Edward Choi and Siddharth Biswal and Bradley Malin... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
58 Noseong Park and Mahmoud Mohammadi and Kshitij Gor... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
59 Zhao, Zilong and Kunar, Aditya and Van der Scheer,... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
60 Kleinberg, Jon and Ludwig, Jens and Mullainathan, ... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.