← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Identifying causal effects with subjective ordinal outcomes
Leonard Goff
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.14622
155
Citation mentions
82
Cited references
14
Sections
22,126
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bond, Timothy N. and Lang, Kevin 2019 17 8 27.0 0.110 1.000 100%
2 Luttmer, Erzo F. P. 2005 23 9 41.0 0.148 1.000 100%
3 Stefan Hoderlein and Enno Mammen 2007 6 4 12.0 0.039 1.000 100%
4 Maximilian Kasy 2022 5 5 10.0 0.032 1.000 100%
5 Rosa L. Matzkin 1994 6 3 12.0 0.039 1.000 100%
6 C.P. Barrington-Leigh 2024 3 3 6.0 0.019 0.843 100%
7 Sasaki, Yuya 2015 3 3 6.0 0.019 0.843 100%
8 Goff, Leonard (self) 2022 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
9 Leonard Goff and Désiré Kédagni and Huan Wu (self) 2024 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
10 Benjamin, Daniel J. and Heffetz, Ori and Kimball, ... 2014 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
11 Montgomery, Mallory 2022 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
12 Carsten Schröder and Shlomo Yitzhaki 2017 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
13 Imbens, Guido W. and Newey, Whitney K. 2009 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
14 Hoderlein, Stefan and Holzmann, Hajo and Kasy, Max... 2016 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
15 Victor Chernozhukov and Iván Fernández-Val and Whi... 2019 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
16 Caspar Kaiser and Maarten C. M. Vendrik 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
17 Qi Li and Jeff Racine 2004 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
18 Rosa L. Matzkin 1992 3 1 6.0 0.019 0.585 100%
19 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Hull, Peter and Kolesá... 2022 3 1 6.0 0.019 0.585 100%
20 Angrist, Joshua D and Pischke, J\"o 2008 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
21 Hamermesh, Daniel S. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
22 Andrew J. Oswald 2008 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
23 Banks, William P. and Coleman, Mark J. 1981 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
24 Angus Deaton 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
25 Helliwell, John F and Barrington-Leigh, Christophe... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
26 Gallup 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
27 Marcus Fleming 1952 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
28 John C. Harsanyi 1955 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Card, David and Mas, Alexandre and Moretti, Enrico... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Lindqvist, Erik and Östling, Robert and Cesarini, ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Perez-Truglia, Ricardo 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Paul Milgrom and Chris Shannon 1994 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Allen, Roy and Rehbeck, John 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Jason Abrevaya and Jerry Hausman. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 King, Gary and Murray, Christopher J. L. and Salom... 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Kapteyn, Arie and Smith, James P. and Van Soest, A... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Molina, Teresa 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Stantcheva, Stefanie 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Caspar Kaiser 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Benjamin, Daniel J and Cooper, Kristen and Heffetz... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Liu, Shuo and Netzer, Nick 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Di Tella, Rafael and MacCulloch, Robert J. and Osw... 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Xavier D’Haultfœuille and Stefan Hoderlein and Yuy... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Rubinstein, Ariel 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Junlong Feng and Sokbae Lee 2025 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Volker Nocke and Nicolas Schutz 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 van Rooij, Maarten and Coibion, Olivier and Georga... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 P. M. Robinson 1988 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Blomquist, Soren and Kumar, Anil and Liang, Che-Yu... 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Saez, Emmanuel 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Yanqin Fan and Sang Soo Park 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Manski, Charles F. and Tamer, Elie 2002 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Imbens, Guido W and Angrist, Joshua D 1994 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Flavio Cunha and James J. Heckman and Salvador Nav... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Stefan Hoderlein and Yuya Sasaki 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Victor Chernozhukov and Iván Fernández-Val and Ste... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Richard Blundell and Dennis Kristensen and Rosa Ma... 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 D'Haultfœuille, Xavier and Février, Philippe 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Torgovitsky, Alexander 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Rosa L. Matzkin 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Stefan Hoderlein and Bettina Siflinger and Joachim... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 S. M. Schennach and Yingyao Hu 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Yingyao Hu 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Ekaterina Oparina and Sorawoot Srisuma 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Hu, Yingyao and Schennach, Susanne M. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Michele De Nadai and Arthur Lewbel 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Breunig, Christoph and Martin, Stephan 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 S. Hoderlein and E. Mammen 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Alberto Abadie 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Gabriella Conti and Stephen Pudney 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Chernozhukov, Victor and Hansen, Christian 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 William Greene 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Bernard M.S. van Praag 1991 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 Hidehiko Ichimura and Petra Todd 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 Shlomo Yitzhaki 1996 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
79 Joshua D. Angrist 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
80 Joshua Angrist and Alan Krueger 1999 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
81 P. Pfanzagl 1979 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
82 Hosseini, Reza 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.