Citation Analysis – 2212.13324

2212.13324
Denis Chetverikov, Elena Manresa
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13324

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,970

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Bai, J	2009	5	3	9.0	0.053	1.000	100%
2	Moon, R. and Weidner, M	2019	7	3	13.0	0.074	1.000	100%
3	Vershynin, R	2018	19	5	34.0	0.200	0.964	89%
4	Bonhomme, S. and Manresa, E (self)	2015	16	8	24.5	0.168	0.957	88%
5	L\"offler, M., Zhang, A., and Zhou, H	2021	3	2	5.0	0.032	0.737	100%
6	Bai, J. and Ng, S	2002	3	2	5.0	0.032	0.737	100%
7	Vempala, S. and Wang, G	2004	2	2	3.0	0.021	0.644	100%
8	Pesaran, H	2006	4	1	4.0	0.042	0.644	100%
9	Hahn, J. and Moon, R	2010	2	1	2.0	0.021	0.511	100%
10	Moitra, A	2018	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
11	Ando, T. and Bai, J	2016	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
12	Ando, T. and Bai, J	2017	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
13	Chen, H., Leng, X., and Wang, W	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
14	Cheng, X., Schorfheide, F., and Shao, P	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
15	Zhang, Y., Wang, H., and Zhu, Z	2017	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
16	Aloise, D., Deshpande, A., Hansen, P., and Popat, ...	2009	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
17	Lin, C. and Ng, S	2012	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
18	Su, L., Shi, Z., and Phillips, P	2016	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
19	Bonhomme, S., Lamadon, T., and Manresa, E (self)	2017	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
20	Su, L. and Ju, G	2018	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
21	Wang, W., Phillips, P., and Su, L	2018	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
22	Gu, J. and Volgushev, S	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
23	Gao, Z. and Shi, Z	2020	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
24	Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., and Rosen, H	1988	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
25	Ahn, S., Lee, Y., and Schmidt, P	2001	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
26	Ahn, S., Lee, Y., and Schmidt, P	2013	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
27	Westerlund, J. and Urbain, J.-P	2013	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
28	Armstrong, T., Weidner, M., and Zeleneev, A	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
29	Connor, G. and Korajzcyk, R	1986	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
30	Connor, G. and Korajzcyk, R	1988	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
31	Stock, J. and Watson, M	1999	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
32	Forni, M., Hallin, M., Lippi, M., and Reichlin, L	2000	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
33	Chudik, A., Pesaran, H., and Tosetti, E	2011	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
34	Onatski, A	2012	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
35	Delyon, B	2009	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
36	Van der Geer, S	2002	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
37	Arellano, M	1987	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
38	Hansen, C	2007	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
39	Yu, Y., Wang, T., and Samworth, R	2015	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
40	Halko, N., Martinsson, P., and Tropp, J	2011	3	1	1.5	0.032	0.126	0%
41	Nicholls, P	1988	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Bai, J

2009

9.0

0.053

1.000

100%

Moon, R. and Weidner, M

2019

13.0

0.074

1.000

100%

Vershynin, R

2018

34.0

0.200

0.964

89%

Bonhomme, S. and Manresa, E (self)

2015

24.5

0.168

0.957

88%

L\"offler, M., Zhang, A., and Zhou, H

2021

5.0

0.032

0.737

100%

Bai, J. and Ng, S

2002

5.0

0.032

0.737

100%

Vempala, S. and Wang, G

2004

3.0

0.021

0.644

100%

Pesaran, H

2006

4.0

0.042

0.644

100%

Hahn, J. and Moon, R

2010

2.0

0.021

0.511

100%

Moitra, A

2018

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Ando, T. and Bai, J

2016

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Ando, T. and Bai, J

2017

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chen, H., Leng, X., and Wang, W

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Cheng, X., Schorfheide, F., and Shao, P

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Zhang, Y., Wang, H., and Zhu, Z

2017

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Aloise, D., Deshpande, A., Hansen, P., and Popat, ...

2009

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Lin, C. and Ng, S

2012

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Su, L., Shi, Z., and Phillips, P

2016

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Bonhomme, S., Lamadon, T., and Manresa, E (self)

2017

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Su, L. and Ju, G

2018

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Wang, W., Phillips, P., and Su, L

2018

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Gu, J. and Volgushev, S

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Gao, Z. and Shi, Z

2020

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., and Rosen, H

1988

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Ahn, S., Lee, Y., and Schmidt, P

2001

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Ahn, S., Lee, Y., and Schmidt, P

2013

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Westerlund, J. and Urbain, J.-P

2013

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Armstrong, T., Weidner, M., and Zeleneev, A

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Connor, G. and Korajzcyk, R

1986

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Connor, G. and Korajzcyk, R

1988

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Stock, J. and Watson, M

1999

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Forni, M., Hallin, M., Lippi, M., and Reichlin, L

2000

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chudik, A., Pesaran, H., and Tosetti, E

2011

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Onatski, A

2012

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Delyon, B

2009

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Van der Geer, S

2002

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Arellano, M

1987

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Hansen, C

2007

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Yu, Y., Wang, T., and Samworth, R

2015

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Halko, N., Martinsson, P., and Tropp, J

2011

1.5

0.032

0.126

Nicholls, P

1988

0.5

0.011

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.