Citation Analysis – \textbfSimultaneous Inference of a Partially Linear Model in Time Series

\textbfSimultaneous Inference of a Partially Linear Model in Time Series
Jiaqi Li, Likai Chen, Kun Ho Kim, Tianwei Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10359

102

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,005

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Kim, Kun Ho and Chao, Shih-Kang and Ha (self)	2021	7	5	11.0	0.069	1.000	100%
2	Weidong Liu and Wei Biao Wu	2010	6	3	8.0	0.059	1.000	100%
3	Zhao, Zhibiao and Wu, Wei Biao	2006	6	5	11.0	0.059	1.000	100%
4	Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and Ka...	2017	7	5	13.0	0.069	1.000	100%
5	Danna Zhang and Wei Biao Wu	2017	3	3	6.0	0.029	0.843	100%
6	Kim, K. H. (self)	2016	4	2	5.0	0.039	0.811	100%
7	Zhao, Z. and W. B. Wu	2008	4	2	5.0	0.039	0.811	100%
8	Ha	1989	3	2	5.0	0.029	0.737	100%
9	P. M. Robinson	1988	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
10	Gao, Jiti and Hong, Shengyan and Liang, Hua	1995	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
11	Aneiros-Pe	2008	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
12	Johnston, Gordon J	1982	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
13	Fan, Jianqing and Gijbels, I.	1996	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
14	Wu, W. B.	2005	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
15	Fama, E.	1984	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
16	Ha	2000	3	1	3.0	0.029	0.585	100%
17	Engle, Robert F. and Granger, C. W. J. and Rice, J...	1986	2	1	2.0	0.020	0.511	100%
18	Liang, Hua and Qin, Yongsong and Zhang, Xinyu and ...	2009	2	1	2.0	0.020	0.511	100%
19	Green, Peter J. and Yandell, Brian S.	1985	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
20	Rice, John	1986	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
21	Speckman, Paul	1988	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
22	Schick, Anton	1996	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
23	Fan, Jianqing and Huang, Tao	2005	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
24	Xie, Huiliang and Huang, Jian	2009	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
25	Hamilton, Scott A. and Truong, Young K.	1997	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
26	Yu, Yan and Ruppert, David	2002	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
27	Fan, Yanqin and Li, Qi	2003	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
28	Liang, Hua and Ha	1997	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
29	Nelson, Daniel B.	1991	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
30	W. H\"a	2010	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
31	Guo, M. and Hardle, W.	2012	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
32	W. B. Wu and Zhao, Z.	2007	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
33	Ming Chen and Qiongxia Song (self)	2015	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
34	Degui Li and Weidong Liu and Qiying Wang and Wei B...	2017	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
35	Ting Zhang and Wei Biao Wu	2015	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
36	Craven, P. and G. Wahba	1979	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
37	Xiaoqian Sun and Jinhong You and Gemai Chen and Xi... (self)	2002	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
38	Shumway, Robert H. and Stoffer, David S.	2005	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
39	Wang, Chuan-Sheng and Zhao, Zhibiao	2016	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
40	Zhao, Zhibiao and Li, Xiaoye	2013	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
41	Domowitz, I. and Hakkio, C.	1985	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
42	Hodrick, R. and Srivastava, S.	1986	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
43	Hodrick, R. J.	1989	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
44	Mark, N. C.	1995	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
45	Baillie, R. T. and Kilic, R.	2006	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
46	Alvarez, F. and Atkeson, A. and Kehoe, P.J.	2009	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
47	Lustig, F. and Roussanov, N. and Verdelhan, A.	2014	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
48	Baillie, R. T. and Kim, K. H. (self)	2015	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
49	Kim, Jinyong and Kim, Kun Ho and Kim, Taejin (self)	2021	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
50	Froot, R. A. and Thaler, R. H.	1990	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
51	Engel, C.	1996	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
52	Baillie, R. T. and Diebold, F. X. and Kapetanios, ... (self)	2023	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
53	Hardle, W. and Mammen, E.	1993	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
54	Burkholder, Donald L.	1988	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
55	Rio, Emmanuel	2009	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
56	Nazarov, Fedor	2003	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
57	Chen, Likai and Wang, Weining and Wu, Weibiao (self)	2022	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
58	Freedman, David A.	1975	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
59	Li, Jiaqi and Chen, Likai and Wang, Weining and Wu... (self)	2023	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Kim, Kun Ho and Chao, Shih-Kang and Ha (self)

2021

11.0

0.069

1.000

100%

Weidong Liu and Wei Biao Wu

2010

8.0

0.059

1.000

100%

Zhao, Zhibiao and Wu, Wei Biao

2006

11.0

0.059

1.000

100%

Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and Ka...

2017

13.0

0.069

1.000

100%

Danna Zhang and Wei Biao Wu

2017

6.0

0.029

0.843

100%

Kim, K. H. (self)

2016

5.0

0.039

0.811

100%

Zhao, Z. and W. B. Wu

2008

5.0

0.039

0.811

100%

1989

5.0

0.029

0.737

100%

P. M. Robinson

1988

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Gao, Jiti and Hong, Shengyan and Liang, Hua

1995

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Aneiros-Pe

2008

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Johnston, Gordon J

1982

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Fan, Jianqing and Gijbels, I.

1996

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Wu, W. B.

2005

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Fama, E.

1984

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

2000

3.0

0.029

0.585

100%

Engle, Robert F. and Granger, C. W. J. and Rice, J...

1986

2.0

0.020

0.511

100%

Liang, Hua and Qin, Yongsong and Zhang, Xinyu and ...

2009

2.0

0.020

0.511

100%

Green, Peter J. and Yandell, Brian S.

1985

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Rice, John

1986

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Speckman, Paul

1988

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Schick, Anton

1996

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Fan, Jianqing and Huang, Tao

2005

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Xie, Huiliang and Huang, Jian

2009

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Hamilton, Scott A. and Truong, Young K.

1997

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Yu, Yan and Ruppert, David

2002

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Fan, Yanqin and Li, Qi

2003

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Liang, Hua and Ha

1997

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Nelson, Daniel B.

1991

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

W. H\"a

2010

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Guo, M. and Hardle, W.

2012

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

W. B. Wu and Zhao, Z.

2007

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Ming Chen and Qiongxia Song (self)

2015

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Degui Li and Weidong Liu and Qiying Wang and Wei B...

2017

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Ting Zhang and Wei Biao Wu

2015

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Craven, P. and G. Wahba

1979

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Xiaoqian Sun and Jinhong You and Gemai Chen and Xi... (self)

2002

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Shumway, Robert H. and Stoffer, David S.

2005

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Wang, Chuan-Sheng and Zhao, Zhibiao

2016

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Zhao, Zhibiao and Li, Xiaoye

2013

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Domowitz, I. and Hakkio, C.

1985

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Hodrick, R. and Srivastava, S.

1986

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Hodrick, R. J.

1989

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Mark, N. C.

1995

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Baillie, R. T. and Kilic, R.

2006

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Alvarez, F. and Atkeson, A. and Kehoe, P.J.

2009

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Lustig, F. and Roussanov, N. and Verdelhan, A.

2014

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Baillie, R. T. and Kim, K. H. (self)

2015

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Kim, Jinyong and Kim, Kun Ho and Kim, Taejin (self)

2021

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Froot, R. A. and Thaler, R. H.

1990

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Engel, C.

1996

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Baillie, R. T. and Diebold, F. X. and Kapetanios, ... (self)

2023

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Hardle, W. and Mammen, E.

1993

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Burkholder, Donald L.

1988

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Rio, Emmanuel

2009

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Nazarov, Fedor

2003

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Chen, Likai and Wang, Weining and Wu, Weibiao (self)

2022

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Freedman, David A.

1975

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Li, Jiaqi and Chen, Likai and Wang, Weining and Wu... (self)

2023

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.