← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Quantifying fairness and discrimination\\in predictive models
Arthur Charpentier
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09868
156
Citation mentions
101
Cited references
6
Sections
12,273
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hardt, Moritz and Price, Eric and Srebro, Nati 2016 9 5 18.0 0.058 1.000 100%
2 Sam Corbett-Davies and Emma Pierson and Avi Feller... 2017 5 4 10.0 0.032 1.000 100%
3 Kearns, Michael and Roth, Aaron 2019 6 3 10.5 0.038 0.941 83%
4 Chouldechova, Alexandra 2017 5 2 10.0 0.032 0.874 100%
5 Dwork, Cynthia and Hardt, Moritz and Pitassi, Toni... 2012 3 3 6.0 0.019 0.843 100%
6 Kleinberg, Jon and Lakkaraju, Himabindu and Leskov... 2017 4 2 8.0 0.026 0.811 100%
7 Kusner, Matt J and Loftus, Joshua and Russell, Chr... 2017 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
8 Feldman, Michael and Friedler, Sorelle A and Moell... 2015 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
9 Kleinberg, Jon and Mullainathan, Sendhil and Ragha... 2016 4 1 8.0 0.026 0.644 100%
10 Kamiran, Faisal and Calders, Toon 2012 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
11 Kamishima, Toshihiro and Akaho, Shotaro and Sakuma... 2011 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
12 Berk, Richard and Heidari, Hoda and Jabbari, Shahi... 2017 3 1 6.0 0.019 0.585 100%
13 Duivesteijn, Wouter and Feelders, Ad 2008 3 1 6.0 0.019 0.585 100%
14 Alex Beutel and Jilin Chen and Zhe Zhao and Ed H. ... 2017 3 1 6.0 0.019 0.585 100%
15 Phelps, Edmund S 1972 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
16 David, HJJOEP 2015 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
17 Gajane, Pratik and Pechenizkiy, Mykola 2017 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
18 \vZ 2017 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
19 Re 1959 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
20 Berk, Richard and Heidari, Hoda and Jabbari, Shahi... 2021 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
21 Christopher Jung and Sampath Kannan and Changhwa L... 2020 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
22 Muhammad Bilal Zafar and Isabel Valera and Manuel ... 2017 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
23 Solon Barocas and Moritz Hardt and Arvind Narayana... 2019 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
24 Kim, Pauline T 2017 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
25 Besse, Philippe and del Barrio, Eustasio and Gorda... 2018 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
26 Kamiran, Faisal and Calders, Toon 2009 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
27 Flavio P. Calmon and Dennis Wei and Karthikeyan Na... 2017 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
28 Menon, Aditya Krishna and Williamson, Robert C 2018 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
29 Charles, Kerwin Kofi and Guryan, Jonathan 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Becker, Gary S 1957 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Edgeworth, Francis Y 1922 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Bohren, J Aislinn and Haggag, Kareem and Imas, Ale... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Aigner, Dennis J and Cain, Glen G 1977 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Becker, G. S. 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Cornu, Ge 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Arthur Charpentier (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Daniels, Norman 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Palmer, Daniel E 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Avraham, Ronen and Logue, Kyle D and Schwarcz, Dan... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Frej Klem Thomsen 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Tarunabh Khaitan 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Thomas, R Guy 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Bernard E. Harcourt 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Rothschild-Elyassi, Gil and Koehler, Johann and Si... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Pedreshi, Dino and Ruggieri, Salvatore and Turini,... 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Kori Hale 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Joi Ito 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 McKinsey 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Bergstrom, Carl T and West, Jevin D 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Heather Kelly 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Chakraborty, Supriyo and Raghavan, Kasturi Rangan ... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Miracle, Jacob M 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Gambs, S\'e 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Dalenius, Tore 1977 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 L. Barry and A. Charpentier (self) 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Scott, John and Marshall, Gordon 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Wirth, Louis 1941 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Charpentier, Arthur and Flachaire, Emmanuel and Ly... (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Sahil Verma and Julia Rubin 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Friedler, Sorelle A and Scheidegger, Carlos and Ve... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Hirschfeld, Hermann Otto 1935 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Gebelein, Hans 1941 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Caton, Simon and Haas, Christian 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Matthews, Brian W 1975 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Chicco, Davide and Jurman, Giuseppe 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Borkan, Daniel and Dixon, Lucas and Sorensen, Jeff... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Beutel, Alex and Chen, Jilin and Doshi, Tulsee and... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Vogel, Robin and Bellet, Aure 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Sokolova, Marina and Japkowicz, Nathalie and Szpak... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Dawid, A Philip 1982 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Van Calster, Ben and McLernon, David J and Van Sme... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 Kru 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Denuit, Michel and Charpentier, Arthur and Trufin,... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 Mercat-Bruns, Marie 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 Biddle, Dan 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
79 \vZ 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
80 Luong, Binh Thanh and Ruggieri, Salvatore and Turi... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
81 Kim, Michael P and Reingold, Omer and Rothblum, Gu... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
82 Donald B. Rubin 1974 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
83 Herna 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
84 Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, Donald B 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
85 Imai, Kosuke 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
86 Morgan, Stephen L and Winship, Christopher 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
87 Cunningham, Scott 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
88 Pearl, Judea and Mackenzie, Dana 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
89 Arthur Charpentier and Emmanuel Flachaire and Ewen... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
90 Kilbertus, Niki and Rojas-Carulla, Mateo and Paras... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
91 Pearl, Judea 1988 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
92 Brian Hu Zhang and Blake Lemoine and Margaret Mitc... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
93 Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani, Robert and Wainwrig... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
94 Goodfellow, Ian and McDaniel, Patrick and Papernot... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
95 Bechavod, Yahav and Ligett, Katrina 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
96 Cho, Jaewoong and Hwang, Gyeongjo and Suh, Changho 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
97 Vincent Grari and Arthur Charpentier and Sylvain L... (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
98 Dwork, Cynthia and Immorlica, Nicole and Kalai, Ad... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
99 Lohia, Pranay K and Ramamurthy, Karthikeyan Natesa... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
100 Awasthi, Pranjal and Kleindessner, Mattha 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
101 Kranzberg, Melvin 1986 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.