← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Robust Design and Evaluation of \\ Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confounding
Ashesh Rambachan, Amanda Coston, Edward Kennedy
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09844
166
Citation mentions
81
Cited references
7
Sections
8,788
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 9 6 15.0 0.054 1.000 100%
2 5 5 9.0 0.030 1.000 100%
3 12 7 20.0 0.072 1.000 100%
4 8 5 13.0 0.048 1.000 100%
5 6 5 11.0 0.036 1.000 100%
6 4 3 6.0 0.024 0.928 100%
7 4 3 6.0 0.024 0.928 100%
8 4 4 7.0 0.024 0.928 100%
9 4 3 6.0 0.024 0.928 100%
10 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
11 3 3 5.0 0.018 0.843 100%
12 3 3 4.0 0.018 0.843 100%
13 Lakkaraju, Himabindu and Kleinberg, Jon and Leskov... 2017 4 2 5.0 0.024 0.811 100%
14 3 2 4.0 0.018 0.737 100%
15 3 2 4.0 0.018 0.737 100%
16 3 2 5.0 0.018 0.737 100%
17 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
18 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
19 Alan Mishler and Edward Kennedy (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
20 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
21 Solon Barocas and Moritz Hardt and Arvind Narayana... 2019 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
22 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
23 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
24 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
25 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
26 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
27 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
28 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
29 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
30 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
31 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
32 Vira Semenova 2023 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
33 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
34 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
35 Kennedy, Edward H (self) 2020 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
36 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
37 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.511 100%
38 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Guerdan, Luke and Coston, Amanda and Holstein, Ken... (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 D\'\i 2013 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Luedtke, Alexander R and Diaz, Ivan and van der La... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 D\'\i 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Vira Semenova 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Steve Yadlowsky and Hongseok Namkoong and Sanjay B... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Chernozhukov, Victor and Cinelli, Carlos and Newey... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Hardt, Moritz and Price, Eric and Srebro, Nati 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Chouldechova, Alexandra 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Victor Chernozhukov and Sokbae Lee and Adam M. Ros... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Oliver Hines and Oliver Dukes and Karla Diaz-Ordaz... 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 Eli Ben-Michael 2025 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
79 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
80 Sasaki, Yuya and Ura, Takuya 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
81 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.