← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\LARGE On regression-adjusted imputation estimators of the average treatment effect
Zhexiao Lin, Fang Han
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05424
193
Citation mentions
85
Cited references
9
Sections
6,700
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., and Todd, P 1998b 6 4 9.0 0.031 1.000 100%
2 Wager, S. and Athey, S 2018 13 5 25.0 0.067 1.000 100%
3 Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W 2011 11 4 16.0 0.057 1.000 100%
4 Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W 2006 8 4 10.5 0.041 0.957 88%
5 Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., and Todd, P. E 1997 4 4 7.0 0.021 0.928 100%
6 Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J. A., and To... 1998a 4 4 7.0 0.021 0.928 100%
7 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du... 2018 8 4 9.5 0.041 0.855 62%
8 Athey, S. and Imbens, G 2016 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
9 Fan, J. and Gijbels, I 1996 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
10 Wasserman, L 2005 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
11 Lin, Z., Ding, P., and Han, F (self) 2021 24 12 27.0 0.124 0.771 46%
12 Imbens, G. W 2004 4 2 4.0 0.021 0.737 75%
13 Stuart, E. A 2010 3 3 4.0 0.016 0.737 67%
14 Hahn, J 1998 3 2 4.0 0.016 0.737 100%
15 Scharfstein, D. O., Rotnitzky, A., and Robins, J. ... 1999 3 2 4.0 0.016 0.737 100%
16 Rubin, D. B 1973b 3 2 4.0 0.016 0.737 100%
17 Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B 1983 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
18 Rubin, D. B 1973a 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
19 Bang, H. and Robins, J. M 2005 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
20 Buja, A., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R 1989 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
21 Huber, M., Lechner, M., and Wunsch, C 2013 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
22 Chen, X. and Christensen, T. M 2018 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
23 Frolich, M 2005 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
24 Evans, L. C. and Garzepy, R. F 2015 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
25 Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., and S... 1984 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
26 Lin, Y. and Jeon, Y (self) 2006 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
27 Scornet, E., Biau, G., and Vert, J.-P 2015 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
28 Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A., and Zhao, L. P 1994 3 1 3.0 0.016 0.585 100%
29 Meinshausen, N. and Ridgeway, G 2006 3 1 6.0 0.016 0.585 100%
30 Tsiatis, A. A 2006 2 2 1.5 0.010 0.511 50%
31 Tsybakov, A. B 2009 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
32 Samworth, R. J 2012 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
33 Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W 2019 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
34 Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
35 Rubin, D. B 1987 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
36 Little, R. J. and Rubin, D. B 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
37 Robins, J. M. and Rotnitzky, A 1995 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
38 Cassel, C. M., Sarndal, C. E., and Wretman, J. H 1976 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
39 Sarndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Robins, J. M. and Ritov, Y 1997 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
41 Kang, J. D. and Schafer, J. L 2007 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., and Ridder, G 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Chan, K. C. G., Yam, S. C. P., and Zhang, Z 2016 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Ben-Michael, E., Feller, A., Hirshberg, D. A., and... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Neyman, J 1923 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Rubin, D. B 1974 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Athey, S. and Wager, S 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Chen, X. and Christensen, T. M 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.-S 2009 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Imbens, G. W 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Robins, J., Sued, M., Lei-Gomez, Q., and Rotnitzky... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Kline, P 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Chattopadhyay, A. and Zubizarreta, J. R 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Guo, K. and Basse, G 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Cohen, P. L. and Fogarty, C. B 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Bickel, P. J 1982 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Efromovich, S 1996 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Zheng, W. and Van Der Laan, M. J 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Frolich, M 2004 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Nadaraya, E. A 1964 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Watson, G. S 1964 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Royall, R. M 1966 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Stone, C. J 1977 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Biau, G. and Devroye, L 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Fan, J 1992 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Fan, J 1993 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Ruppert, D. and Wand, M. P 1994 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Simonoff, J. S 1996 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Breiman, L 2001 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Biau, G. and Scornet, E 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Hill, J. L 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Athey, S., Tibshirani, J., and Wager, S 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
75 Biau, G. and Devroye, L 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Mentch, L. and Hooker, G 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Wager, S., Hastie, T., and Efron, B 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
78 Biau, G., Devroye, L., and Lugosi, G 2008 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Scornet, E 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Genuer, R 2012 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Chi, C.-M., Vossler, P., Fan, Y., and Lv, J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
82 Klusowski, J. and Tian, P 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
83 Durrett, R 2019 2 2 1.0 0.010 0.139 0%
84 Billingsley, P 1995 2 1 1.0 0.010 0.110 0%
85 Boucheron, S., Lugosi, G., and Massart, P 2013 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.