← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\LARGEOn the Non-Identification of Revenue Production Functions
David Van Dijcke
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04620
117
Citation mentions
47
Cited references
10
Sections
6,912
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 De Loecker, Jan and Goldberg, Pinelopi K and Khand... 2016 7 5 11.5 0.060 1.000 100%
2 Ackerberg, Daniel A and Caves, Kevin and Frazer, G... 2015 5 3 8.5 0.043 1.000 100%
3 Demirer, Mert 2022 9 3 15.0 0.077 1.000 100%
4 Gandhi, Amit and Navarro, Salvador and Rivers, Dav... 2020 9 3 16.5 0.077 1.000 100%
5 De Loecker, Jan 2011 6 3 10.5 0.051 1.000 100%
6 Dhyne, Emmanuel and Petrin, Amil and Smeets, Valer... 2020 6 4 9.5 0.051 1.000 100%
7 De Loecker, Jan 2021 4 3 7.0 0.034 0.928 100%
8 Orr, Scott 2022 5 2 8.5 0.043 0.874 100%
9 Basu, Susanto and Fernald, John G 1997 3 3 4.5 0.026 0.843 100%
10 De Loecker, Jan and Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou 2014 3 3 4.5 0.026 0.843 100%
11 Chambers, Robert G 1988 6 3 7.5 0.051 0.794 50%
12 Olley, G Steven and Pakes, Ariel 1996 3 2 4.5 0.026 0.737 100%
13 Levinsohn, James and Petrin, Amil 2003 3 2 4.5 0.026 0.737 100%
14 McFadden, Daniel 1978 3 3 4.5 0.026 0.737 67%
15 Bond, Steve and Hashemi, Arshia and Kaplan, Greg a... 2020 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
16 De Loecker, Jan and Syverson, Chad 2021 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
17 De Loecker, Jan and Warzynski, Frederic 2012 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
18 De Loecker, J and Eeckhout, J and Unger, G 2020 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
19 Shephard, Ronald W 1953 3 2 4.5 0.026 0.644 67%
20 Diewert, W Erwin 2022 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
21 Klette, Tor Jakob 1999 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
22 Valmari, Nelli 2023 3 1 6.0 0.026 0.585 100%
23 Shephard, Ronald William 1970 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.511 50%
24 Mairesse, Jacques and Jaumandreu, Jordi 2005 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.511 50%
25 Abbott, Thomas A 1992 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Klette, Tor Jakob and Griliches, Zvi 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 De Ridder, Maarten and Grassi, Basile and Morzenti... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Ornaghi, Carmine 2008 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Collard-Wexler, Allan and De Loecker, Jan 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Smeets, Valerie and Warzynski, Frederic 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Atalay, Enghin 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Allcott, Hunt and Collard-Wexler, Allan and O'Conn... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Blundell, Richard and Bond, Stephen 2000 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Keller, Wolfgang and Yeaple, Stephen R 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Amiti, Mary and Konings, Jozef 2007 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Bloom, Nicholas and Draca, Mirko and Van Reenen, J... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Brandt, Loren and Van Biesebroeck, Johannes and Wa... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Halpern, La 2015 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Syverson, Chad 2011 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Hall, Robert E 1990 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Foster, Lucia and Haltiwanger, John and Syverson, ... 2008 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Hsieh, Chang-Tai and Klenow, Peter J 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Doraszelski, Ulrich and Jaumandreu, Jordi 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Munch, Jakob R and Nguyen, Daniel X 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Bernard, Andrew B and Dhyne, Emmanuel and Magerman... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Matzkin, Rosa L 2007 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.