← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2212.02178
Rico Krueger, Michel Bierlaire, Prateek Bansal
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.02178
88
Citation mentions
73
Cited references
12
Sections
6,987
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ghaffar, A., Mitra, S., and Hyland, M 2020 4 3 6.0 0.045 0.928 100%
2 Petrin, A. and Train, K 2010 3 3 3.5 0.034 0.843 100%
3 Tirachini, A 2020 3 2 2.5 0.034 0.737 100%
4 Lurkin, V., Garrow, L. A., Higgins, M. J., Newman,... 2017 3 2 4.5 0.034 0.737 100%
5 Marquet, O 2020 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
6 von Behren, S., Chlond, B., and Vortisch, P 2021 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
7 Bierlaire, M. and Krueger, R (self) 2020 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
8 McFadden, D 2012 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
9 Goletz, M. and Bahamonde-Birke, F. J 2021 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
10 Koppelman, F. S., Coldren, G. M., and Parker, R. A 2008 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
11 Alemi, F., Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P., and Handy... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
12 Castillo, J. C., Knoepfle, D., and Weyl, G 2017 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
13 Wang, H. and Yang, H 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
14 Habib, K. N 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
15 Lam, C. T., Liu, M., and Hui, X 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Guevara, C. A. and Ben-Akiva, M. E 2012 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Gopalakrishnan, R., Guevara, C. A., and Ben-Akiva,... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Westat 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 United States Census Bureau 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 US Environmental Protection Agency 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 National Centers for Environmental Information 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 US Energy Information Agency 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Federal Transit Administration 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 City of Chicago 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Mcfadden, D 1999 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Guevara, C. A 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 McFadden, D 1981 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D 1981 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 McFadden, D 1978 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Bierlaire, M., Bolduc, D., and McFadden, D (self) 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Train, K. E 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Wen, C.-H., Huang, C.-J., and Fu, C 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Nevo, A 2000 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., and Pakes, A 1995 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Hausman, J., Leonard, G., and Zona, J. D 1994 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Hausman, J. A 1996 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Bierlaire, M (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 McMahon, K 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Acheampong, R. A., Siiba, A., Okyere, D. K., and T... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Alonso-Gonzalez, M. J., van Oort, N., Cats, O., Ho... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Asgari, H. and Jin, X 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Azimi, G., Rahimi, A., and Jin, X 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Baker, D. M 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Bansal, P., Sinha, A., Dua, R., and Daziano, R. A (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Bi, H. and Ye, Z 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Dean, M. D. and Kockelman, K. M 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Dey, B. K., Tirtha, S. D., Eluru, N., and Konduri,... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Dong, X., Guerra, E., and Daziano, R. A 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Dong, X 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Edwards, M 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Gomez, J., Aguilera-Garc\'\ia, A., Dias, F. F., Bh... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Hasnine, M. S., Hawkins, J., and Habib, K. N 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Hou, Y., Garikapati, V., Weigl, D., Henao, A., Mon... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 Kang, S., Mondal, A., Bhat, A. C., and Bhat, C. R 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Lazarus, J. R., Caicedo, J. D., Bayen, A. M., and ... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 Li, W., Shalaby, A., and Habib, K. N 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 Loa, P., Mashrur, S. M., and Nurul Habib, K 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
59 Loa, P. and Habib, K. N 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
60 Malik, J., Bunch, D. S., Handy, S., and Circella, ... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
61 Nugroho, S. B., Zusman, E., and Nakano, R 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
62 Sabogal-Cardona, O., Oviedo, D., Scholl, L., Crott... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
63 Sabouri, S., Park, K., Smith, A., Tian, G., and Ew... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
64 Shen, H., Zou, B., Lin, J., and Liu, P 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
65 Soltani, A., Allan, A., Khalaj, F., Pojani, D., an... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
66 Sweet, M. N 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
67 Toman, P., Zhang, J., Ravishanker, N., and Konduri... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
68 Tu, M., Li, W., Orfila, O., Li, Y., and Gruyer, D 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
69 Ward, J. W., Michalek, J. J., Samaras, C., Azevedo... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
70 Wang, X., Yan, X., Zhao, X., and Cao, Z 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
71 Yan, X., Liu, X., and Zhao, X 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
72 Yan, X., Zhao, X., Han, Y., Van Hentenryck, P., an... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
73 Yu, H. and Peng, Z.-R 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.