← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Cointegration with Occasionally Binding Constraints
James A. Duffy, Sophocles Mavroeidis, Sam Wycherley
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09604
117
Citation mentions
71
Cited references
12
Sections
7,031
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bykhovskaya, A. and J. A. Duffy (self) 2024 8 7 12.5 0.068 0.957 88%
2 Johansen, S. 1995 4 4 7.0 0.034 0.928 100%
3 Duffy, J. A., S. Mavroeidis, and S. Wycherley (self) 2023 5 4 8.5 0.043 0.928 80%
4 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2008 5 2 8.0 0.043 0.874 100%
5 Mavroeidis, S. (self) 2021 4 2 7.0 0.034 0.811 100%
6 Aruoba, S. B., M. Mlikota, F. Schorfheide, and S. ... 2022 4 2 7.0 0.034 0.811 100%
7 Gonzalo, J. and J.-Y. Pitarakis 2006 3 2 5.0 0.026 0.737 100%
8 Laubach, T. and J. C. Williams 2003 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
9 Cogley, T. and A. M. Sbordone 2008 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
10 Ikeda, D., S. Li, S. Mavroeidis, and F. Zanetti (self) 2024 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
11 Saikkonen, P. and I. Choi 2004 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
12 Cavaliere, G. 2005 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
13 Liu, W., S. Ling, and Q.-M. Shao 2011 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
14 Gao, J., D. Tj\ostheim, and J. Yin 2013 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
15 Ascari, G., P. Bonomolo, and Q. Haque 2023 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
16 Tj\ostheim, D. 2020 3 1 3.0 0.026 0.585 100%
17 Hansen, P. R. 2005 5 4 4.0 0.043 0.585 20%
18 Jungers, R. M. 2009 4 4 3.5 0.034 0.585 25%
19 Liebscher, E. 2005 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
20 Stock, J. H. 1994 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Watson, M. W. 1994 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Blanchard, O. J. and D. Quah 1989 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Summers, L. H. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Williams, J. C. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Eggertsson, G. B., N. R. Mehrotra, and J. A. Robbi... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Kocherlakota, N. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Del Negro, M., D. Giannone, M. P. Giannoni, and A.... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Andrade, P., J. Gali, H. L. Bihan, and J. Matheron 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Bauer, M. D. and G. D. Rudebusch 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Schmitt-Grohe, S. and M. Uribe 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Gambacorta, L., B. Hofmann, and G. Peersman 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Wu, J. C. and F. D. Xia 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Debortoli, D., J. Gali, and L. Gambetti 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Cai, B., J. Gao, and D. Tj\ostheim 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Balke, N. S. and T. B. Fomby 1997 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Hansen, B. E. and B. Seo 2002 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Saikkonen, P. 2005 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Seo, M. H. 2011 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Escribano, A. and S. Mira 2002 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Kristensen, D. and A. Rahbek 2010 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2013 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Park, J. Y. and P. C. B. Phillips 1999 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2001 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Chan, N. and Q. Wang 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Li, D., D. Tj\ostheim, and J. Gao 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Karlsen, H. A., T. Myklebust, and D. Tj\ostheim 2007 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Wang, Q. and P. C. B. Phillips 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Duffy, J. A. (self) 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Duffy, J. A. and I. Kasparis (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2012 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Dong, C., J. Gao, D. Tj\ostheim, and J. Yin 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Wang, Q., D. Wu, and K. Zhu 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Berenguer-Rico, V. and B. Nielsen 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Xiao, Z. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Phillips, P. C. B. and Y. Wang 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Aruoba, S. B., P. Cuba-Borda, K. Higa-Flores, F. S... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Blanchard, O. J., G. Dell'Ariccia, and P. Mauro 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Coibion, O., Y. Gorodnichenko, and J. Wieland 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Maddala, G. S. 1983 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Demiralp, S. and O. Jord\`a 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 De Jong, R. and A. M. Herrera 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Brezigar-Masten, A., I. Masten, and M. Volk 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Bykhovskaya, A. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Berenguer-Rico, V. and J. Gonzalo 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 Muller, U. K. and M. W. Watson 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Harrison, J. M. 1985 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 Meitz, M. and P. Saikkonen 2008 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Duffy, J. A. and X. Jiao (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
70 Lutkepohl, H. 2007 2 2 1.0 0.017 0.139 0%
71 Horn, R. A. and C. R. Johnson 2013 2 1 1.0 0.017 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.