Citation Analysis

\bf\sc Graph Neural Networks for Causal Inference Under Network Confounding
Michael P. Leung, Pantelis Loupos
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07823
168
Citation mentions
78
Cited references
13
Sections
14,237
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Leung (self) 2022 16 8 31.0 0.095 1.000 100%
2 Kojevnikov, Marmer and Song 2021 15 7 30.0 0.089 1.000 100%
3 Kojevnikov 2021 5 3 10.0 0.030 1.000 100%
4 He and Song 2024 10 4 20.0 0.060 1.000 100%
5 Morris, Lipman, Maron, Rieck, Kriege, Grohe, Fey a... 2021 5 3 8.5 0.030 1.000 100%
6 Farrell, Liang and Misra 2021 5 5 8.5 0.030 1.000 100%
7 Emmenegger, Spohn and Buhlmann 2025 4 4 8.0 0.024 0.928 100%
8 Farrell 2018 4 3 8.0 0.024 0.928 100%
9 Xu 2018 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
10 Xu, Hu, Leskovec and Jegelka 2018 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
11 Gao and Ding 2025 3 2 6.0 0.018 0.737 100%
12 Wang, Gu and Otsu 2024 7 1 14.0 0.042 0.693 100%
13 Azizian and Lelarge 2021 6 1 12.0 0.036 0.693 100%
14 Lin and Vella 2021 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
15 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,... 2018 2 2 3.0 0.012 0.644 100%
16 Alon and Yahav 2021 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
17 Li, Han and Wu 2018 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
18 Ogburn, Sofrygin, Diaz and van der Laan 2024 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
19 Leung and Moon (self) 2025 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
20 Forastiere, Airoldi and Mealli 2021 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
21 Sanchez-Becerra 2022 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
22 4 1 8.0 0.024 0.644 100%
23 Zhou, Dong, Wang, Lee, Hooi, Xu and Feng 2021 2 2 4.0 0.012 0.644 100%
24 Leung (self) 2025 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
25 Belloni, Chernozhukov and Hansen 2014 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
26 Chen, Villar, Chen and Bruna 2019 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
27 Morris, Ritzert, Fey, Hamilton, Lenssen, Rattan an... 2019 2 1 4.0 0.012 0.511 100%
28 DiTraglia, Garcia-Jimeno, O'Keeffe-O'Donovan and S... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Hoshino and Yanagi 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Kang and Imbens 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Hoshino and Yanagi 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Jackson, Lin and Yu 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Kim 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Balat and Han 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Imai, Jiang and Malani 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Athey, Eckles and Imbens 2018 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Li and Wager 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Toulis and Kao 2013 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Liu, Hudgens, Saul, Clemens, Ali and Emch 2019 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Qu, Xiong, Liu and Imbens 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Veitch, Wang and Blei 2019 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Auerbach 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Auerbach and Tabord-Meehan 2023 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Kriege, Johansson and Morris 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Wu, Pan, Chen, Long, Zhang and Philip 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Athey, Imbens, Metzger and Munro 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Kaji, Manresa and Pouliot 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Pollmann 2023 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Bramoulle, Djebbari and Fortin 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Manski 1993 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Manski 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Aronow and Samii 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Savje 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Imbens 2000 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Abadie, Imbens and Zheng 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Jin and Rothenhausler 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 DeGroot 1974 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Kallenberg 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Paszke, Gross, Massa, Lerer, Bradbury et al. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Fey and Lenssen 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Das, Huang, Adeshina, Yang and Bachega 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Ying, He, Chen, Eksombatchai, Hamilton and Leskove... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Ma, Hu, Lu and Bhattacharyya 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Bronstein 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Banerjee, Chandrasekhar, Duflo and Jackson 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Hornik, Stinchcombe and White 1989 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Kobler, Schoning and Toran 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Maron, Ben-Hamu, Serviansky and Lipman 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Grohe 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Kiefer and McKay 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Babai, Erd\Hos and Selkow 1980 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Zopf 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Oono and Suzuki 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 Topping, Di Giovanni, Chamberlain, Dong and Bronst... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Dwivedi, Joshi, Laurent, Bengio and Bresson 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 Royden and Fitzpatrick 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 2 1 2.0 0.012 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.