← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2211.07506
Eoghan O'Neill
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07506
246
Citation mentions
69
Cited references
11
Sections
7,138
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chipman, Hugh A and George, Edward I and McCulloch... 2010 10 5 18.0 0.041 1.000 100%
2 George, Edward and Laud, Purushottam and Logan, Br... 2019 6 3 11.0 0.024 1.000 100%
3 Sigrist, Fabio and Hirnschall, Christoph 2019 29 5 57.0 0.118 1.000 100%
4 Groot, Perry and Lucas, Peter JF 2012 32 5 62.0 0.130 1.000 100%
5 Jacobson, Tate and Zou, Hui 2022 30 5 59.0 0.122 1.000 100%
6 Friedman, Jerome H 1991 47 4 94.0 0.191 1.000 100%
7 Linero, Antonio R and Yang, Yun 2018 4 3 6.0 0.016 0.928 100%
8 Nie, Xinkun and Wager, Stefan 2021 7 2 14.0 0.028 0.874 100%
9 Chib, Siddhartha 1992 3 3 5.0 0.012 0.843 100%
10 Friedberg, Rina and Tibshirani, Julie and Athey, S... 2020 4 2 8.0 0.016 0.811 100%
11 Caron, Alberto and Baio, Gianluca and Manolopoulou... 2022 3 2 6.0 0.012 0.737 100%
12 Helsel, Dennis R and others 2005 5 1 10.0 0.020 0.693 100%
13 Tobin, James 1958 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
14 Bradic, Jelena and Guo, Jiaqi 2016 2 2 3.0 0.008 0.644 100%
15 Escobar, Michael D and West, Mike 1995 2 2 4.0 0.008 0.644 100%
16 Van Hasselt, Martijn 2011 2 2 4.0 0.008 0.644 100%
17 Soret, Perrine and Avalos, Marta and Wittkop, Lind... 2018 2 1 2.0 0.008 0.511 100%
18 Ji, Yonggang and Lin, Nan and Zhang, Baoxue 2012 2 1 2.0 0.008 0.511 100%
19 Hahn, P Richard and Murray, Jared S and Carvalho, ... 2020 2 1 4.0 0.008 0.511 100%
20 McCulloch, Robert E and Sparapani, Rodney A and Lo... 2021 2 1 4.0 0.008 0.511 100%
21 Junk, GA and Spalding, RF and Richard, JJ 1980 2 1 4.0 0.008 0.511 100%
22 Deshmukh, Sanket 2020 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
23 Zhou, He and Qian, Wei and Yang, Yi 2020 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
24 Kottas, Athanasios and Krnjaji\'c 2009 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
25 Lewbel, Arthur and Linton, Oliver 2002 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
26 Fan, Jianqing and Gijbels, Irene 1994 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
27 Huang, Hailin 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
28 Chen, Songnian and Dahl, Gordon B and Khan, Shakee... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
29 Cheng, Jing and Small, Dylan S 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
30 Heuchenne, Ce 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
31 Heuchenne, Ce 2010 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
32 Huang, Hailin and Tang, Yanlin and Li, Yuanzhang a... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
33 Oganisian, Arman and Mitra, Nandita and Roy, Jason... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
34 Cao, Fang and Ba, Shan and Brenneman, William A an... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
35 Gammelli, Daniele and Peled, Inon and Rodrigues, F... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
36 Gammelli, Daniele and Rolsted, Kasper Pryds and Pa... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
37 Basson, Marno and Louw, Tobias M and Smith, Theres... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
38 Zhang, Jiaming and Li, Zhanfeng and Song, Xinyuan ... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
39 Wu, Wush and Yeh, Mi-Yen and Chen, Ming-Syan 2018 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
40 Taddy, Matthew A and Kottas, Athanasios 2010 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
41 Zhang, Xinyu and Wan, Alan TK and Zhou, Sherry Z 2012 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
42 Mu 2016 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
43 Powell, James L 1984 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
44 Yu, Keming and Stander, Julian 2007 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
45 Alhamzawi, Rahim 2016 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
46 Alhamzawi, Ahmed 2020 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
47 Chipman, Hugh A and George, Edward I and McCulloch... 1998 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
48 Rossi, Peter 2014 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
49 Ku 2019 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
50 Breiman, Leo 2001 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
51 Wendling, Thierry and Jung, Kenneth and Callahan, ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
52 McConnell, K John and Lindner, Stephan 2019 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
53 Dorie, Vincent and Hill, Jennifer and Shalit, Uri ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
54 Hahn, P Richard and Dorie, Vincent and Murray, Jar... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
55 Chakraborty, S 2016 1 1 1.0 0.004 0.406 100%
56 Escobar, Michael D 1994 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
57 Escobar, Michael D and West, Mike 1998 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
58 Chib, Siddhartha and Greenberg, Edward 2010 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
59 Bush, Christopher A and MacEachern, Steven N 1996 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
60 West, Mike and Mukker, Peter M and Escobar, Michae... 1994 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
61 Conley, Timothy G and Hansen, Christian B and McCu... 2008 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
62 Antoniak, Charles E 1974 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
63 Moulton, Lawrence H and Halsey, Neal A 1995 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
64 Job, JAYAKARAN S and Halsey, NEAL A and Boulos, RE... 1991 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
65 Mueller, DK and Ruddy, BC and Battaglin, WA 1997 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
66 Zirschky, John H and Harris, Daniel J 1986 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
67 Leisch, Friedrich and Dimitriadou, Evgenia 2010 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
68 Harrison Jr, David and Rubinfeld, Daniel L 1978 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
69 Pace, R Kelley and Gilley, Otis W 1997 1 1 2.0 0.004 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.