← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Fast, Robust Inference for Linear Instrumental Variables Models using Self-Normalized Moments
Eric Gautier, Christiern Rose
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02249
119
Citation mentions
59
Cited references
8
Sections
4,250
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Gautier, E. and C. Rose, \enquoteHigh-dimensional ... (self) 2021 7 4 7.0 0.059 1.000 100%
2 Kleibergen, F., \enquotePivotal statistics for tes... 2002 4 3 4.5 0.034 0.928 100%
3 Moreira, M. J., Tests with correct size in the sim... 2002 4 3 4.5 0.034 0.928 100%
4 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---, \enquoteA condi... 2003 4 3 4.5 0.034 0.928 100%
5 Mikusheva, A., \enquoteRobust confidence sets in t... 2010 4 3 5.5 0.034 0.928 100%
6 Kang, H., A. Zhang, T. T. Cai and D. S. Small, \en... 2016 4 3 5.5 0.034 0.928 100%
7 Guggenberger, P., F. Kleibergen, S. Mavroeidis and... 2012 4 3 5.5 0.034 0.928 100%
8 Guggenberger, P., F. Kleibergen and S. Mavroeidis,... 2019 4 3 5.5 0.034 0.928 100%
9 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---, \enquoteA Power... 2021 4 3 5.5 0.034 0.928 100%
10 Belloni, A., C. Hansen and W. Newey, \enquoteHigh-... 2022 5 2 3.5 0.042 0.874 100%
11 Lasserre, J. B., \enquoteGlobal optimization with ... 2001 5 2 10.0 0.042 0.874 100%
12 Anderson, T. W. and H. Rubin, \enquoteEstimation o... 1949 3 3 3.5 0.025 0.843 100%
13 Andrews, I., J. H. Stock and L. Sun, \enquoteWeak ... 2019 3 3 3.5 0.025 0.843 100%
14 Andrews, I., \enquoteConditional linear combinatio... 2016 3 3 3.5 0.025 0.843 100%
15 Kolesar, M., R. Chetty, J. Friedman, E. Glaeser an... 2015 3 3 3.5 0.025 0.843 100%
16 4 2 8.0 0.034 0.811 100%
17 Bertail, P., E. Gautherat and H. Harari-Kermadec, ... 2008 3 2 4.5 0.025 0.737 100%
18 Belloni, A., D. Chen, V. Chernozhukov and C. Hanse... 2012 3 2 3.0 0.025 0.737 100%
19 Pinelis, I., \enquoteExtremal probabilistic proble... 1994 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
20 Jing, B.-Y., Q.-M. Shao and Q. Wang, \enquoteSelf-... 2003 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
21 Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov and K. Kato, \enq... 2013 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
22 Gold, D., J. Lederer and J. Tao, \enquoteInference... 2020 3 1 1.5 0.025 0.585 100%
23 Gautier, E., C. Rose and A. Tsybakov, \enquoteHigh... (self) 2018 2 2 2.0 0.017 0.511 50%
24 Gautier, E. and A. Tsybakov, \enquoteHigh-dimensio... (self) 2011 2 1 1.0 0.017 0.511 100%
25 Rose, C., \enquoteIdentification of Spillover Effe... (self) 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Farrell, M. H., T. Liang and S. Misra, \enquoteDee... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Lee, W., \enquoteIdentification and estimation of ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Auerbach, E., \enquoteTesting for Differences in S... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Bekker, P. A., \enquoteAlternative approximations ... 1994 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Angrist, J. D., G. W. Imbens and A. B. Krueger, \e... 1999 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Donald, S. G. and W. K. Newey, \enquoteChoosing th... 2001 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Anderson, T., \enquoteOrigins of the limited infor... 2005 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Chao, J. C. and N. R. Swanson, \enquoteConsistent ... 2005 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
34 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Hansen, C., J. Hausman and W. Newey, \enquoteEstim... 2008 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Ackerberg, D. A. and P. J. Devereux, \enquoteImpro... 2009 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
37 van Hasselt, M., \enquoteMany instruments asymptot... 2010 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, J. A. Hausman, W. K. N... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Hausman, J. A., W. K. Newey, T. Woutersen, J. C. C... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Anatolyev, S., \enquoteInstrumental variables esti... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Hansen, C. and D. Kozbur, \enquoteInstrumental var... 2014 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Kolesar, M., \enquoteMinimum distance approach to ... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
43 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt---, \enquoteMany in... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Sargan, J. D., \enquoteThe estimation of economic ... 1958 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Hansen, L. P., \enquoteLarge sample properties of ... 1982 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Anatolyev, S. and N. Gospodinov, \enquoteSpecifica... 2011 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Lee, Y. and R. Okui, \enquoteHahn--Hausman test as... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Chao, J. C., J. A. Hausman, W. K. Newey, N. R. Swa... 2014 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Chen, X., Q.-M. Shao, W. B. Wu and L. Xu, \enquote... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Dufour, J.-M., \enquoteSome impossibility theorems... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Zhang, D. and W. B. Wu, \enquoteGaussian approxima... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Tibshirani, R., \enquoteRegression shrinkage and s... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 Candes, E. and T. Tao, \enquoteThe Dantzig selecto... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
54 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
55 Lasserre, J. B., K.-C. Toh and S. Yang, \enquoteA ... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
56 Weisser, T., J. B. Lasserre and K.-C. Toh, \enquot... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
57 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
58 Kaido, H., F. Molinari and J. Stoye, \enquoteConst... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
59 Feng, M., J. E. Mitchell, J.-S. Pang, X. Shen and ... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.