Citation Analysis

\textscAre Synthetic Control Weights Balancing Score?
Harsh Parikh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01575
15
Citation mentions
8
Cited references
3
Sections
1,864
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ferman, Bruno and Pinto, Cristine 2017 3 3 5.0 0.200 0.843 100%
2 Abadie, Alberto and Diamond, Alexis and Hainmuelle... 2015 3 2 4.0 0.200 0.737 100%
3 Abadie, Alberto and Diamond, Alexis and Hainmuelle... 2010 2 2 3.0 0.133 0.644 100%
4 Rosenbaum, Paul R and Rubin, Donald B 1983 2 1 2.0 0.133 0.511 100%
5 Hansen, Ben B 2008 2 1 2.0 0.133 0.511 100%
6 Ferman, Bruno and Pinto, Cristine 2016 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
7 Shi, Xu and Miao, Wang and Hu, Mengtong and Tchetg... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
8 Johnson, Clay Stephen 2013 1 1 1.0 0.067 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.