← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Stochastic treatment choice with empirical welfare updating
Toru Kitagawa, Hugo Lopez, Jeff Rowley
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01537
160
Citation mentions
78
Cited references
10
Sections
6,306
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Manski, Charles F 2004 5 3 5.5 0.031 1.000 100%
2 Kitagawa, Toru and Tetenov, Aleksey (self) 2018 25 7 38.5 0.156 0.958 88%
3 McAllester, David A 2003 4 3 6.5 0.025 0.928 100%
4 Be 2016 8 4 10.0 0.050 0.909 75%
5 Alquier, Pierre and Ridgway, James and Chopin, Nic... 2016 8 4 8.5 0.050 0.909 75%
6 Germain, Pascal and Lacasse, Alexandre and Laviole... 2009 3 3 4.5 0.019 0.843 100%
7 Bloom, Howard S and Orr, Larry L and Bell, Stephen... 1997 3 2 5.0 0.019 0.737 100%
8 Chamberlain, Gary 2011 3 2 3.0 0.019 0.737 100%
9 Maurer, Andreas 2004 6 3 4.5 0.037 0.693 33%
10 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2021 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
11 Hirano, Keisuke and Porter, Jack R 2009 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
12 Tetenov, Aleksey 2012 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
13 Dwork, Cynthia and Hardt, Moritz and Pitassi, Toni... 2012 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
14 Swaminathan, Adith and Joachims, Thorsten 2015 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
15 Adjaho, Christopher and Christensen, Timothy 2022 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
16 Kido, Daido 2022 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
17 Toru Kitagawa and Aleksey Tetenov (self) 2021 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
18 Bissiri, Pier Giovanni and Holmes, Chris C and Wal... 2016 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
19 Csaba, Da 2020 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
20 Vapnik, Vladimir Naumovich 1998 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
21 Kitagawa, Toru and Rowley, Jeff (self) 2022 8 4 7.0 0.050 0.630 25%
22 Kitagawa, Toru and Lee, Sokbae and Qiu, Chen (self) 2022 3 1 1.5 0.019 0.585 100%
23 Stoye, Jo 2012 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
24 Yata, Kohei 2021 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
25 Bianca Zadrozny 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
26 Catoni, Olivier 2007 2 2 1.0 0.013 0.511 50%
27 Karlin, Samuel and Rubin, Herman 1956 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
28 Victor Chernozhukov and Han Hong 2003 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Rai, Yoshiyasu 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Ishihara, Takuya and Kitagawa, Toru (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Schlag, Karl H 2006 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Stoye, Jo 2009 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Bhattacharya, Debopam and Dupas, Pascaline 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Beygelzimer, Alina and Langford, John 2009 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Zhang, Baqun and Tsiatis, Anastasios A and Davidia... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Zhao, Yingqi and Zeng, Donglin and Rush, A John an... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
37 D'Adamo, Riccardo 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Han, Sukjin 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Kitagawa, Toru and Sakaguchi, Shosei and Tetenov, ... (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Liu, Yan 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Mbakop, Eric and Tabord-Meehan, Max 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Xinkun Nie and Emma Brunskill and Stefan Wager 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Shosei Sakaguchi 2019 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Sasaki, Yuya and Ura, Takuya 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Liyang Sun 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Davide Viviano 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Manski, Charles F 2009 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Manski, Charles F 2000 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Manski, Charles F 2005 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Manski, Charles F 2007 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Manski, Charles F 2007 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Manski, Charles F 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Manski, Charles F and Tetenov, Aleksey 2007 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Kock, Anders Bredahl and Preinerstorfer, David and... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Thompson, William R 1933 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Dehejia, Rajeev H 2005 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Valiant, Leslie G 1984 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
58 McAllester, David A 1999 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Shawe-Taylor, John and Williamson, Robert C 1997 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Be 2014 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Derbeko, Philip and El-Yaniv, Ran and Meir, Ron 2004 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Pentina, Anastasia and Lampert, Christoph H 2015 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Seeger, Matthias 2002 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Guedj, Benjamin 2019 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Pellatt, Daniel F 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Kasy, Maximilian 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Rosenbaum, Paul R and Rubin, Donald B 1983 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Ilya Molchanov 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Gunsilius, Florian 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Manski, Charles F 2000 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Martin J. Wainwright and Michael I. Jordan 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Wood, Andrew TA 1994 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Kurz, Gerhard and Hanebeck, Uwe D 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Heckman, James J and Ichimura, Hidehiko and Todd, ... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 Abadie, Alberto and Angrist, Joshua and Imbens, Gu... 2002 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Amos, Donald E 1974 3 2 1.5 0.019 0.159 0%
77 Boucheron, Ste 2013 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
78 Mardia, Kanti V and Jupp, Peter E 2009 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.