Citation Analysis – Weak Identification in Low-Dimensional Factor Models with One or Two Factors

Weak Identification in Low-Dimensional Factor Models with One or Two Factors
Gregory Cox
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00329

102

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,683

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Anderson, T. and Rubin, H	1956	6	3	11.0	0.059	1.000	100%
2	Stock, J. and Wright, J	2000	6	4	11.0	0.059	1.000	100%
3	Kleibergen, F	2005	8	4	14.0	0.078	1.000	100%
4	Cox, G (self)	2022	7	4	12.0	0.069	1.000	100%
5	Attanasio, O., Cattan, S., Fitzsimons, E., Meghir,...	2020a	9	2	17.0	0.088	0.874	100%
6	Han, S. and McCloskey, A	2019	6	2	9.0	0.059	0.874	100%
7	Chaudhuri, S. and Zivot, E	2011	3	3	5.0	0.029	0.843	100%
8	Andrews, I. and Mikusheva, A	2016b	4	2	5.0	0.039	0.811	100%
9	Andrews, I	2018	4	2	8.0	0.039	0.811	100%
10	Andrews, D	2017	3	2	6.0	0.029	0.737	100%
11	Cunha, F. and Heckman, J	2008	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
12	Cunha, F., Heckman, J., and Schennach, S	2010	2	2	3.0	0.020	0.644	100%
13	Guggenberger, P. and Smith, R	2005	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
14	Guggenberger, P., Ramalho, J., and Smith, R	2012	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
15	Andrews, I	2016	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
16	Andrews, I. and Mikusheva, A	2016a	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
17	Andrews, D	1999	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
18	Williams, B	2020	3	1	3.0	0.029	0.585	100%
19	Bai, J. and Li, K	2012	2	1	4.0	0.020	0.511	100%
20	Andrews, D. and Cheng, X	2012	2	1	4.0	0.020	0.511	100%
21	Anderson, T. and Rubin, H	1949	2	1	4.0	0.020	0.511	100%
22	Attanasio, O., Fern\'andez, C., Fitzsimons, E., Gr...	2014	2	1	4.0	0.020	0.511	100%
23	Harman, H	1976	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
24	Thompson, B	2004	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
25	Gorsuch, R	2014	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
26	Brown, T	2015	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
27	Carneiro, P., Hansen, K., and Heckman, J	2003	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
28	Heckman, J., Stixrud, J., and Urzua, S	2006	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
29	Heckman, J., Pinto, R., and Savelyev, P	2013	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
30	Briggs, N. and MacCallum, R	2003	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
31	Xim\'enez, C	2006	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
32	Onatski, A	2012	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
33	Freyaldenhoven, S	2022	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
34	Chamberlain, G. and Rothschild, M	1983	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
35	Bai, J	2003	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
36	Dufour, J.-M	1997	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
37	Dufour, J.-M. and Jasiak, J	2001	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
38	Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P	2017	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
39	Guggenberger, P. and Smith, R	2008	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
40	Otsu, T	2006	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
41	Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P	2019	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
42	Attanasio, O., Meghir, C., and Nix, E	2020b	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
43	Agostinelli, F. and Wiswall, M	2021	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Anderson, T. and Rubin, H

1956

11.0

0.059

1.000

100%

Stock, J. and Wright, J

2000

11.0

0.059

1.000

100%

Kleibergen, F

2005

14.0

0.078

1.000

100%

Cox, G (self)

2022

12.0

0.069

1.000

100%

Attanasio, O., Cattan, S., Fitzsimons, E., Meghir,...

2020a

17.0

0.088

0.874

100%

Han, S. and McCloskey, A

2019

9.0

0.059

0.874

100%

Chaudhuri, S. and Zivot, E

2011

5.0

0.029

0.843

100%

Andrews, I. and Mikusheva, A

2016b

5.0

0.039

0.811

100%

Andrews, I

2018

8.0

0.039

0.811

100%

Andrews, D

2017

6.0

0.029

0.737

100%

Cunha, F. and Heckman, J

2008

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Cunha, F., Heckman, J., and Schennach, S

2010

3.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Guggenberger, P. and Smith, R

2005

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Guggenberger, P., Ramalho, J., and Smith, R

2012

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Andrews, I

2016

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Andrews, I. and Mikusheva, A

2016a

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Andrews, D

1999

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Williams, B

2020

3.0

0.029

0.585

100%

Bai, J. and Li, K

2012

4.0

0.020

0.511

100%

Andrews, D. and Cheng, X

2012

4.0

0.020

0.511

100%

Anderson, T. and Rubin, H

1949

4.0

0.020

0.511

100%

Attanasio, O., Fern\'andez, C., Fitzsimons, E., Gr...

2014

4.0

0.020

0.511

100%

Harman, H

1976

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Thompson, B

2004

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Gorsuch, R

2014

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Brown, T

2015

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Carneiro, P., Hansen, K., and Heckman, J

2003

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Heckman, J., Stixrud, J., and Urzua, S

2006

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Heckman, J., Pinto, R., and Savelyev, P

2013

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Briggs, N. and MacCallum, R

2003

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Xim\'enez, C

2006

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Onatski, A

2012

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Freyaldenhoven, S

2022

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Chamberlain, G. and Rothschild, M

1983

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bai, J

2003

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Dufour, J.-M

1997

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Dufour, J.-M. and Jasiak, J

2001

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P

2017

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Guggenberger, P. and Smith, R

2008

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Otsu, T

2006

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P

2019

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Attanasio, O., Meghir, C., and Nix, E

2020b

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Agostinelli, F. and Wiswall, M

2021

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.