Citation Analysis

Shrinkage Methods for Treatment Choice
Takuya Ishihara, Daisuke Kurisu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17063
39
Citation mentions
16
Cited references
9
Sections
7,242
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2012 7 3 10.0 0.179 1.000 100%
2 Ishihara, T. and T. Kitagawa (self) 2024 5 4 9.0 0.128 1.000 100%
3 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2004 5 3 6.0 0.128 0.928 80%
4 Tetenov, A. 2012 3 2 4.0 0.077 0.737 100%
5 Kitagawa, T. and A. Tetenov 2018 3 2 6.0 0.077 0.737 100%
6 Armstrong, T. B. and M. Kolesar 2018 2 2 3.0 0.051 0.644 100%
7 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2021 2 2 3.0 0.051 0.644 100%
8 Montiel Olea, J., C. Qiu, and J. Stoye 2025 2 2 3.0 0.051 0.644 100%
9 Yata, K. 2025 2 2 3.0 0.051 0.644 100%
10 Xie, X., S. Kou, and L. D. Brown 2012 2 1 4.0 0.051 0.511 100%
11 Manski, C. F. 2000 1 1 1.0 0.026 0.406 100%
12 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2007 1 1 1.0 0.026 0.406 100%
13 Hirano, K. and J. R. Porter 2009 1 1 1.0 0.026 0.406 100%
14 Stoye, J. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.026 0.406 100%
15 James, W. and C. Stein 1961 1 1 2.0 0.026 0.406 100%
16 Abadie, A., J. Angrist, and G. Imbens 2002 1 1 2.0 0.026 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.