Citation Analysis

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using a Conditional Moment Based Approach
Xiaolin Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15829

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

3,332

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, M. Demirer, E. D...	2018	13	4	19.5	0.186	0.974	92%
2	Antoine, B. and X. Sun (self)	2021	18	6	29.0	0.257	0.962	89%
3			8	2	12.0	0.114	0.874	100%
4	Lavergne, P. and V. Patilea	2013	3	3	5.0	0.043	0.843	100%
5	Robinson, P		4	2	6.0	0.057	0.811	100%
6	van de Geer, S	2016	3	2	5.0	0.043	0.737	100%
7	Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin	2015	2	2	3.0	0.029	0.644	100%
8	Finkelstein, A., S. Taubman, B. Wright, M. Bernste...	2012	3	1	6.0	0.043	0.585	100%
9	Li, Q. and J. S. Racine	2006	2	1	2.0	0.029	0.511	100%
10	Bierens, H	1982	2	1	4.0	0.029	0.511	100%
11	Hoeffding, W	1948	2	2	2.5	0.029	0.511	50%
12	Baicker, K., A. Finkelstein, J. Song, and S. Taubm...	2014	2	1	4.0	0.029	0.511	100%
13	Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist	1994	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
14	Wooldridge, J. M	2010	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
15	Wooldridge, J	1997	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
16	Wooldridge, J. M	2004	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
17	Nekipelov, D., V. Semenova, and V. Syrgkanis	2018	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
18	Antoine, B. and P. Lavergne	2014	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
19			1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
20			1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.