← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Prediction intervals for economic fixed-event forecasts
Fabian Krüger, Hendrik Plett
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13562
115
Citation mentions
73
Cited references
10
Sections
5,446
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Patton, A. J. and A. Timmermann 2011 12 4 24.0 0.104 1.000 100%
2 Diebold, F. X. and R. S. Mariano 1995 8 2 16.0 0.070 0.874 100%
3 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2012 3 3 6.0 0.026 0.843 100%
4 Henzi, A. 2023 4 2 7.0 0.035 0.737 75%
5 Lazarus, E., D. J. Lewis, J. H. Stock, and M. W. W... 2018 3 2 5.0 0.026 0.644 67%
6 Gneiting, T. and A. E. Raftery 2005 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
7 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2007 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
8 Shaked, M. and J. G. Shanthikumar 2007 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
9 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2013 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
10 Lichtendahl Jr, K. C., Y. Grushka-Cockayne, and R.... 2013 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
11 Bracher, J., D. Wolffram, J. Deuschel, K. Gorgen, ... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
12 Raftery, A. E. 2016 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
13 Kruger, F. and L. Pavlova 2024 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
14 Zeileis, A. 2004 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
15 Zeileis, A., S. Koll, and N. Graham 2020 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
16 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2018 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
17 Jordan, A., F. Kruger, and S. Lerch 2019 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
18 Henzi, A., J. F. Ziegel, and T. Gneiting 2021 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
19 Heinisch, K., C. Behrens, J. Dopke, A. Foltas, U. ... 2023 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
20 Hamilton, J. D. 1994 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
21 Clark, T. and M. McCracken 2013 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
22 Quaedvlieg, R. 2021 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
23 Tagesschau 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Gneiting, T., A. E. Raftery, A. H. Westveld, and T... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Rasp, S. and S. Lerch 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Vannitsem, S., J. B. Bremnes, J. Demaeyer, G. R. E... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Knuppel, M. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Kruger, F. and I. Nolte 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Clark, T. E., M. W. McCracken, and E. Mertens 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Aruoba, S. B., F. X. Diebold, and C. Scotti 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Brave, S. A., R. A. Butters, and D. Kelley 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Lewis, D. J., K. Mertens, J. H. Stock, and M. Triv... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Eraslan, S. and T. Gotz 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Croushore, D. and T. Stark 2001 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Kruger, F. and J. F. Ziegel 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Hansen, B. E. and S. Lee 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Matheson, J. E. and R. L. Winkler 1976 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 R Core Team 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Kruger, F., S. Lerch, T. Thorarinsdottir, and T. G... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Christoffersen, P. F. and F. X. Diebold 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Anatolyev, S. and N. Gospodinov 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Henzi, A., A. Mosching, and L. Dumbgen 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Wang, X., R. J. Hyndman, F. Li, and Y. Kang 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Koenker, R. and G. Bassett Jr 1978 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Gneiting, T. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Gneiting, T. and R. Ranjan 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Bergmeir, C., R. J. Hyndman, and B. Koo 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Halle Institute for Economic Research 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Dopke, J. and U. Fritsche 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Kohler, T. and J. Dopke 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Foltas, A. and C. Pierdzioch 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Genre, V., G. Kenny, A. Meyler, and A. Timmermann 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Claeskens, G., J. R. Magnus, A. L. Vasnev, and W. ... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Faust, J. and J. H. Wright 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Engelberg, J., C. F. Manski, and J. Williams 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Clements, M. P. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Knuppel, M. and A. L. Vladu 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Ganics, G., B. Rossi, and T. Sekhposyan 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Clark, T. E., G. Ganics, and E. Mertens 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Diebold, F. X. and M. Gobel 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Reifschneider, D. and P. Tulip 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Galbraith, J. W. and S. Van Norden 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 European Commission 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Dhami, M. K. and D. R. Mandel 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 Hepenstrick, C. and J. Blunier 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Newey, W. K. and K. D. West 1994 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
70 Harvey, D., S. Leybourne, and P. Newbold 1997 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
71 Coroneo, L. and F. Iacone 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
72 Coroneo, L., F. Iacone, and F. Profumo 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
73 Lutkepohl, H. 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.