Citation Analysis

\begindocument
Nathan Canen, Anujit Chakraborty
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12549
74
Citation mentions
17
Cited references
9
Sections
5,947
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bursztyn, Leonardo and Gonza 2020 6 4 10.0 0.081 1.000 100%
2 Cantoni, Davide and Yang, David Y and Yuchtman, No... 2019 42 13 60.0 0.568 0.941 83%
3 Hager, Anselm and Hensel, Lukas and Hermle, Johann... 2022 4 3 6.0 0.054 0.928 100%
4 Jarke-Neuert, Johannes and Perino, Grischa and Sch... 2021 4 2 6.0 0.054 0.811 100%
5 Hager, Anselm and Hensel, Lukas and Hermle, Johann... 2022 4 2 6.0 0.054 0.811 100%
6 Chen, Yuyu and Yang, David Y 2019 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
7 Gehlbach, Scott and Sonin, Konstantin and Svolik, ... 2016 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
8 Kendall, Chad and Nannicini, Tommaso and Trebbi, F... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
9 Cruz, Cesi and Keefer, Philip and Labonne, Julien ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
10 Tullock, Gordon 1971 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
11 Palfrey, Thomas R and Rosenthal, Howard 1984 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
12 Olson, Mancur 2009 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
13 Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
14 Passarelli, Francesco and Tabellini, Guido 2017 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Barbera, Salvador and Jackson, Matthew O. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Chenoweth, Erica and Stephan, Maria 2011 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Morris, Stephen and Shin, Hyun Song 2003 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.