Citation Analysis – Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework \\for Panel Data Under Network Interference

Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework \\for Panel Data Under Network Interference
Anish Agarwal, Sarah H. Cen, Devavrat Shah, Christina Lee Yu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11355

109

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,354

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Abadie, A	2021	5	4	9.0	0.046	1.000	100%
2	Manski, C. F	2013	3	2	3.0	0.028	0.737	100%
3	Yu, C. L., Airoldi, E. M., Borgs, C., and Chayes, ...	2022	3	2	3.0	0.028	0.737	100%
4	Agarwal, A., Shah, D., and Shen, D (self)	2020b	23	9	22.5	0.211	0.731	39%
5	Sussman, D. L. and Airoldi, E. M	2017a	3	1	1.5	0.028	0.585	100%
6	Aronow, P. M., Samii, C., et al	2017	2	1	1.0	0.018	0.511	100%
7	Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L., and Kleinb...	2013	2	1	1.0	0.018	0.511	100%
8	Basse, G. W. and Airoldi, E. M	2018b	2	1	1.0	0.018	0.511	100%
9	Eckles, D., Karrer, B., and Ugander, J	2017	2	1	1.0	0.018	0.511	100%
10	Cortez, M., Eichhorn, M., and Yu, C. L	2022a	2	1	1.0	0.018	0.511	100%
11	Cortez, M., Eichhorn, M., and Yu, C. L	2022b	2	1	1.0	0.018	0.511	100%
12	Chin, A	2019	2	1	1.0	0.018	0.511	100%
13	Zack, G. W., Rogers, W. E., and Latt, S. A	1977	2	2	2.5	0.018	0.511	50%
14	Satopaa, V., Albrecht, J., Irwin, D., and Raghavan...	2011	2	2	2.5	0.018	0.511	50%
15	Chatterjee, S	2015	2	2	2.5	0.018	0.511	50%
16	Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., and Mullainathan, S	2004	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
17	Basse, G. W. and Airoldi, E. M	2018a	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
18	Karwa, V. and Airoldi, E. M	2018	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
19	Viviano, D	2020	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
20	Auerbach, E. and Tabord-Meehan, M	2021	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
21	Li, W., Sussman, D. L., and Kolaczyk, E. D	2021	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
22	Bargagli-Stoffi, F. J., Tortu, C., and Forastiere,...	2020	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
23	Bhattacharya, R., Malinsky, D., and Shpitser, I	2020	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
24	Toulis, P. and Kao, E	2013	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
25	Cai, J., De Janvry, A., and Sadoulet, E	2015	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
26	Gui, H., Xu, Y., Bhasin, A., and Han, J	2015	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
27	Johari, R., Li, H., Liskovich, I., and Weintraub, ...	2022	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
28	Bajari, P., Burdick, B., Imbens, G. W., Masoero, L...	2021	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
29	De Paula, A	2017	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
30	Jagadeesan, R., Pillai, N. S., and Volfovsky, A	2020	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
31	Savje, F., Aronow, P. M., and Hudgens, M. G	2021	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
32	Leung, M. P	2019	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
33	Ma, Y. and Tresp, V	2021	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
34	Aronow, P. M	2012	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
35	Bowers, J., Fredrickson, M. M., and Panagopoulos, ...	2013	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
36	Athey, S., Eckles, D., and Imbens, G. W	2018	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
37	Pouget-Abadie, J., Saveski, M., Saint-Jacques, G.,...	2017	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
38	Saveski, M., Pouget-Abadie, J., Saint-Jacques, G.,...	2017	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
39	Tchetgen, E. J. T. and VanderWeele, T. J	2012	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
40	Perez-Heydrich, C., Hudgens, M. G., Halloran, M. E...	2014	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
41	Liu, L., Hudgens, M. G., and Becker-Dreps, S	2016	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
42	DiTraglia, F. J., Garcia-Jimeno, C., O'Keeffe-O'Do...	2020	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
43	Vazquez-Bare, G	2022	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
44	Verbitsky-Savitz, N. and Raudenbush, S. W	2012	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
45	Ogburn, E. L., Sofrygin, O., Diaz, I., and Van der...	2017	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
46	Belloni, A., Fang, F., and Volfovsky, A	2022	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
47	Forastiere, L., Airoldi, E. M., and Mealli, F	2021	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
48	De Paula, A., Rasul, I., and Souza, P	2018	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
49	De Paula, A., Rasul, I., and Souza, P	2019	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
50	Agarwal, A., Dahleh, M., Shah, D., and Shen, D (self)	2021a	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.406	100%
51	Sussman, D. L. and Airoldi, E. M	2017b	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
52	Aronow, P. M. and Samii, C	2017	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
53	Arkhangelsky, D., Athey, S., Hirshberg, D. A., Imb...	2019	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
54	Shah, D., Song, D., Xu, Z., and Yang, Y (self)	2020	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
55	Agarwal, A., Shah, D., Shen, D., and Song, D (self)	2021b	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
56	Agarwal, A., Shah, D., and Shen, D (self)	2020a	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
57	Jensen, T. R. and Toft, B	2011	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
58	Agarwal, A., Shah, D., and Shen, D (self)	2023b	6	1	3.0	0.055	0.149	0%
59	Agarwal, A., Agarwal, A., and Vijaykumar, S (self)	2023a	3	1	1.5	0.028	0.126	0%
60	Matou\vsek, J	2008	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Abadie, A

2021

9.0

0.046

1.000

100%

Manski, C. F

2013

3.0

0.028

0.737

100%

Yu, C. L., Airoldi, E. M., Borgs, C., and Chayes, ...

2022

3.0

0.028

0.737

100%

Agarwal, A., Shah, D., and Shen, D (self)

2020b

22.5

0.211

0.731

39%

Sussman, D. L. and Airoldi, E. M

2017a

1.5

0.028

0.585

100%

Aronow, P. M., Samii, C., et al

2017

1.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L., and Kleinb...

2013

1.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Basse, G. W. and Airoldi, E. M

2018b

1.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Eckles, D., Karrer, B., and Ugander, J

2017

1.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Cortez, M., Eichhorn, M., and Yu, C. L

2022a

1.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Cortez, M., Eichhorn, M., and Yu, C. L

2022b

1.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Chin, A

2019

1.0

0.018

0.511

100%

Zack, G. W., Rogers, W. E., and Latt, S. A

1977

2.5

0.018

0.511

50%

Satopaa, V., Albrecht, J., Irwin, D., and Raghavan...

2011

2.5

0.018

0.511

50%

Chatterjee, S

2015

2.5

0.018

0.511

50%

Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., and Mullainathan, S

2004

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Basse, G. W. and Airoldi, E. M

2018a

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Karwa, V. and Airoldi, E. M

2018

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Viviano, D

2020

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Auerbach, E. and Tabord-Meehan, M

2021

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Li, W., Sussman, D. L., and Kolaczyk, E. D

2021

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Bargagli-Stoffi, F. J., Tortu, C., and Forastiere,...

2020

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Bhattacharya, R., Malinsky, D., and Shpitser, I

2020

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Toulis, P. and Kao, E

2013

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Cai, J., De Janvry, A., and Sadoulet, E

2015

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Gui, H., Xu, Y., Bhasin, A., and Han, J

2015

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Johari, R., Li, H., Liskovich, I., and Weintraub, ...

2022

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Bajari, P., Burdick, B., Imbens, G. W., Masoero, L...

2021

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

De Paula, A

2017

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Jagadeesan, R., Pillai, N. S., and Volfovsky, A

2020

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Savje, F., Aronow, P. M., and Hudgens, M. G

2021

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Leung, M. P

2019

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Ma, Y. and Tresp, V

2021

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Aronow, P. M

2012

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Bowers, J., Fredrickson, M. M., and Panagopoulos, ...

2013

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Athey, S., Eckles, D., and Imbens, G. W

2018

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Pouget-Abadie, J., Saveski, M., Saint-Jacques, G.,...

2017

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Saveski, M., Pouget-Abadie, J., Saint-Jacques, G.,...

2017

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Tchetgen, E. J. T. and VanderWeele, T. J

2012

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Perez-Heydrich, C., Hudgens, M. G., Halloran, M. E...

2014

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Liu, L., Hudgens, M. G., and Becker-Dreps, S

2016

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

DiTraglia, F. J., Garcia-Jimeno, C., O'Keeffe-O'Do...

2020

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Vazquez-Bare, G

2022

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Verbitsky-Savitz, N. and Raudenbush, S. W

2012

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Ogburn, E. L., Sofrygin, O., Diaz, I., and Van der...

2017

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Belloni, A., Fang, F., and Volfovsky, A

2022

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Forastiere, L., Airoldi, E. M., and Mealli, F

2021

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

De Paula, A., Rasul, I., and Souza, P

2018

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

De Paula, A., Rasul, I., and Souza, P

2019

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Agarwal, A., Dahleh, M., Shah, D., and Shen, D (self)

2021a

0.5

0.009

0.406

100%

Sussman, D. L. and Airoldi, E. M

2017b

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Aronow, P. M. and Samii, C

2017

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Arkhangelsky, D., Athey, S., Hirshberg, D. A., Imb...

2019

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Shah, D., Song, D., Xu, Z., and Yang, Y (self)

2020

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Agarwal, A., Shah, D., Shen, D., and Song, D (self)

2021b

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Agarwal, A., Shah, D., and Shen, D (self)

2020a

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Jensen, T. R. and Toft, B

2011

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Agarwal, A., Shah, D., and Shen, D (self)

2023b

3.0

0.055

0.149

Agarwal, A., Agarwal, A., and Vijaykumar, S (self)

2023a

1.5

0.028

0.126

Matou\vsek, J

2008

0.5

0.009

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.