← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

A Causal Framework for Linear Dynamical Systems: \\ Synthetic Controls in the Dynamic Treatment Regime
Anish Agarwal, Sukjin Han, Dwaipayan Saha, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Haeyeon Yoon
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11003
95
Citation mentions
69
Cited references
12
Sections
16,539
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Paravisini, Daniel and Rappoport, Veronica and Sch... 2015 3 3 4.5 0.032 0.843 100%
2 Agarwal, Anish and Shah, Devavrat and Shen, Dennis (self) 2020 19 7 16.0 0.200 0.717 37%
3 A. Abadie and J. Gardeazabal 2003 2 2 1.5 0.021 0.644 100%
4 A. Abadie and A. Diamond and J. Hainmueller 2010 2 2 1.5 0.021 0.644 100%
5 Anish Agarwal and Devavrat Shah and Dennis Shen an... (self) 2021 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
6 Agarwal, Anish and Shah, Devavrat and Shen, Dennis (self) 2020 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
7 Amiti, Mary and Weinstein, David E. 2011 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
8 Chor, Davin and Manova, Kalina 2012 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
9 Shahn, Zach and Dukes, Oliver and Richardson, Davi... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
10 De Chaisemartin, Cle 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
11 de Chaisemartin, Cle 2025 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
12 Han, Sukjin (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
13 Han, Sukjin (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
14 Hsu, Yu-Chin and Shen, Shu 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
15 Sojitra, Ravi B and Syrgkanis, Vasilis (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Robins, James M. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Stijn Vansteelandt and Marshall Joffe 2014 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Lewis, Greg and Syrgkanis, Vasilis (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Ashenfelter, Orley C and Card, David 1984 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Bertrand, Marianne and Duflo, Esther and Mullainat... 2004 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Joshua D. Angrist and Jörn-Steffen Pischke 2009 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Hsiao, Cheng and Steve Ching, H. and Ki Wan, Shui 2012 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
23 N. Doudchenko and G. Imbens 2016 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Kathleen T. Li and David R. Bell 2017 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Xu, Yiqing 2017 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Amjad, Muhammad Jehangir and Shah, Devavrat and Sh... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Amjad, Muhummad and Mishra, Vishal and Shah, Devav... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Kathleen T. Li 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Dmitry Arkhangelsky and Susan Athey and David A. H... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Jushan Bai and Serena Ng 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Eli Ben-Michael and Avi Feller and Jesse Rothstein 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Chan, Mark K. and Kwok, Simon 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Victor Chernozhukov and Kaspar Wuthrich and Yinchu... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Iván Fernández-Val and Hugo Freeman and Martin Wei... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Athey, Susan and Bayati, Mohsen and Doudchenko, Ni... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
36 De Chaisemartin, Cle 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Callaway, Brantly and Sant’Anna, Pedro HC 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Sun, Liyang and Abraham, Sarah 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Borusyak, Kirill and Jaravel, Xavier and Spiess, J... 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Shaikh, Azeem M and Toulis, Panos 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Ben-Michael, Eli and Feller, Avi and Rothstein, Je... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Powell, David 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Cattaneo, Matias D and Feng, Yingjie and Palomba, ... 2025 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Chamberlain, Gary 1984 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Liang, Kung-Yee and Zeger, Scott L. 1986 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Arellano, Manuel and Honore, Bo 2000 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Jushan Bai 2003 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Jushan Bai 2009 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
49 M. Hashem Pesaran 2006 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Hyungsik Roger Moon and Martin Weidner 2015 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Moon, Hyungsik Roger and Weidner, Martin 2017 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Agarwal, Anish and Dahleh, Munther and Shah, Devav... (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Geweke, J. 1976 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Stock, James H. and Watson, Mark W. 2011 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
55 Gary Chamberlain 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Imbens, Guido and Kallus, Nathan and Mao, Xiaojie 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
57 Kalman, R. E. 1960 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
58 Ljung, L. 1999 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
59 Hardt, Moritz and Ma, Tengyu and Recht, Benjamin 2016 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
60 Criscuolo, Chiara and Martin, Ralf and Overman, He... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
61 Rotemberg, Martin 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
62 Felbermayr, Gabriel J and Yalcin, Erdal 2013 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
63 Vershynin, Roman 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
64 Herna 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
65 Niepmann, Friederike and Schmidt-Eisenlohr, Tim 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
66 Schmidt-Eisenlohr, Tim 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
67 Antras, Pol and Foley, C Fritz 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
68 Zhao, Yingqi and Zeng, Donglin and Rush, A John an... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
69 Zhao, Ying-Qi and Zeng, Donglin and Laber, Eric B ... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.