Citation Analysis

Concentration inequalities of MLE and robust MLE
Xiaowei Yang, Xinqiao Liu, Haoyu Wei
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09398

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

3,710

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Miao, Y	2010	7	2	10.0	0.226	0.874	100%
2	Maurer, A. and Pontil, M	2021	6	2	12.0	0.194	0.874	100%
3	Catoni, O	2012	2	2	3.0	0.065	0.644	100%
4	Mardia, K., Southworth, H., and Taylor, C	1999	2	2	4.0	0.065	0.644	100%
5	Lerasle, M	2019	2	1	2.0	0.065	0.511	100%
6	Cramer, H	1946	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
7	Shao, J	2010	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
8	Huber, P. J	1964	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
9	Sun, Q., Zhou, W.-X., and Fan, J	2020	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
10	Sun, Q	2021	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
11	Zhang, H. and Wei, H (self)	2022	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
12	Yao, Q. and Zhang, H	2022	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
13	Arnold, B. C	2014	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
14	Weinberg, G. V	2017	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
15	Buldygin, V. V. and Kozachenko, I. V	2000	1	1	1.0	0.032	0.406	100%
16	Zhang, H. and Lei, X	2022	1	1	2.0	0.032	0.406	100%
17	Zhang, H. and Chen, S. X	2021	1	1	2.0	0.032	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.