Citation Analysis

\textbfFast Estimation of Bayesian State Space Models Using Amortized Simulation-Based Inference
Ramis Khabibullin, Sergei Seleznev
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07154
109
Citation mentions
85
Cited references
11
Sections
4,581
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lueckmann, J.-M., Boelts, J., Greenberg, D., Gonca... 2021 5 4 9.0 0.046 1.000 100%
2 Kim, S., Shephard, N., and Chib, S 1998 5 3 6.0 0.046 0.843 60%
3 Lueckmann, J.-M., Goncalves, P. J., Bassetto, G., ... 2017 4 4 5.0 0.037 0.843 75%
4 Papamakarios, G. and Murray, I 2016 3 2 4.5 0.028 0.737 100%
5 Diebold, F. X., Schorfheide, F., and Shin, M 2017 4 3 5.0 0.037 0.737 50%
6 Deli Gatti, D. and Grazzini, J 2020 2 2 1.5 0.018 0.644 100%
7 Cranmer, K., Brehmer, J., and Louppe, G 2020 2 2 1.5 0.018 0.644 100%
8 Tan, L. S., Bhaskaran, A., and Nott, D. J 2020 3 1 6.0 0.028 0.585 100%
9 Justiniano, A. and Primiceri, G. E 2008 2 2 1.5 0.018 0.511 50%
10 Anderson, G. and Moore, G 1985 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.511 50%
11 Durkan, C., Murray, I., and Papamakarios, G 2020 2 1 1.0 0.018 0.511 100%
12 Brehmer, J., Louppe, G., Pavez, J., and Cranmer, K 2020 2 1 1.0 0.018 0.511 100%
13 Hodrick, R. J. and Prescott, E. C 1997 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
14 Laubach, T. and Williams, J. C 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
15 Carriero, A., Clark, T. E., and Marcellino, M 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
16 Hamilton, J. D 1989 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
17 Primiceri, G. E 2005 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
18 Koop, G. and Korobilis, D 2012 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 Chiu, C. W., Eraker, B., Foerster, A. T., Kim, T. ... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Schorfheide, F. and Song, D 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Schorfheide, F. and Song, D 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Otrok, C. and Whiteman, C. H 1998 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Stock, J. H. and Watson, M 2011 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Smets, F. and Wouters, R 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Smets, F. and Wouters, R 2007 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Fernández-Villaverde, J., Rubio-Ramírez, J., and S... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Lux, T 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Casella, G. and George, E. I 1992 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Chib, S. and Greenberg, E 1995 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Neal, R. M 1996 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Del Moral, P., Doucet, A., and Jasra, A 2006 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Andrieu, C., Doucet, A., and Holenstein, R 2010 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Chopin, N., Jacob, P. E., and Papaspiliopoulos, O 2013 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Beal, M. J 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Gunawan, D., Kohn, R., and Nott, D 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Wainwright, M. and Jordan, M 2008 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Hoffman, M. D., Blei, D. M., Wang, C., and Paisley... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Orphanides, A. and Van Norden, S 2002 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Beaumont, M. A., Zhang, W., and Balding, D. J 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Blum, M. G. and Fran\ccois, O 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Rezende, D. and Mohamed, S 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Van der Vaart, A. W 2000 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Linde, J., Smets, F., and Wouters, R 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Walsh, C 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Blanchard, O. J. and Kahn, C. M 1980 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Klein, P 2000 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Sims, C. A 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 US Census Bureau 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradb... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Sisson, S. A., Fan, Y., and Beaumont, M 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Greenberg, D., Nonnenmacher, M., and Macke, J 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Wood, S. N 2010 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Lueckmann, J.-M., Bassetto, G., Karaletsos, T., an... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Papamakarios, G., Sterratt, D., and Murray, I 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Hermans, J., Begy, V., and Louppe, G 2020 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Le, T. A., Baydin, A. G., and Wood, F 2017 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Baydin, A., Shao, L., Bhimji, W., Heinrich, L., Me... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Munk, A., Zwartsenberg, B., Scibior, A., Baydin, A... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
59 McFadden, D 1989 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Duffie, D. and Singleton, K. J 1993 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Gallant, A. R. and Tauchen, G 1996 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Carrasco, M. and Florens, J.-P 2002 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Nickl, R. and Potscher, B. M 2010 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Kaji, T., Manresa, E., and Pouliot, G 2020 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Gallant, A. R. and McCulloch, R. E 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
66 Gallant, A. R., Giacomini, R., and Ragusa, G 2013 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Fen, C 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
68 Finn, C. and Levine, S 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Vinyals, O., Blundell, C., Lillicrap, T., Wierstra... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
70 Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
71 Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M 2014 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
72 Dai, Z., Damianou, A., Gonzalez, J., and Lawrence,... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
73 Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutske... 2014 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
74 Kingma, D. P., Salimans, T., and Welling, M 2015 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
75 Gal, Y. and Ghahramani, Z 2016 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
76 Tran, D., Ranganath, R., and Blei, D 2017 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
77 Blei, D. M., Kucukelbir, A., and McAuliffe, J. D 2017 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
78 Kushner, H. and Yin, G. G 2003 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
79 Mandt, S., Hoffman, M. D., and Blei, D. M 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
80 Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kapla... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
81 Harrison, J., Sharma, A., and Pavone, M 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
82 Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J 2014 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
83 Roberts, G. O. and Rosenthal, J. S 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
84 Durbin, J. and Koopman, S. J 2002 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
85 Tan, L. S. and Nott, D. J 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.