← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Robust Estimation and Inference\\in Panels with Interactive Fixed Effects
Timothy B. Armstrong, Martin Weidner, Andrei Zeleneev
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.06639
145
Citation mentions
72
Cited references
10
Sections
5,555
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Pesaran, M. H 2006 5 3 7.0 0.034 1.000 100%
2 Bai, J 2009 14 6 16.5 0.097 1.000 100%
3 Javanmard, A. and A. Montanari 2014 5 4 6.5 0.034 1.000 100%
4 Zhu, Y 2019 8 3 6.0 0.055 0.909 75%
5 Moon, H. R. and M. Weidner (self) 2015 12 7 14.5 0.083 0.874 67%
6 Chetverikov, D. and E. Manresa 2022 5 2 4.5 0.034 0.874 100%
7 Wolfers, J 2006 6 2 9.0 0.041 0.763 67%
8 Armstrong, T. B., M. Kolesár, and S. Kwon (self) 2020 4 4 4.0 0.028 0.737 50%
9 Kim, D. and T. Oka 2014 4 2 6.5 0.028 0.737 75%
10 Onatski, A 2010 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
11 Armstrong, T. B. and M. Kolesar (self) 2018 3 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 67%
12 Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hansen 2014 2 2 1.5 0.014 0.644 100%
13 van de Geer, S., P. Bühlmann, Y. Ritov, and R. Dez... 2014 2 2 1.5 0.014 0.644 100%
14 Zhang, C.-H. and S. S. Zhang 2014 2 2 1.5 0.014 0.644 100%
15 Hirshberg, D. A. and S. Wager 2020 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
16 Yata, K 2021 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
17 Fernandez-Val, I., H. Freeman, and M. Weidner (self) 2021 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
18 Cox, G. F 2024 4 1 4.0 0.028 0.644 100%
19 Bonhomme, S. and E. Manresa 2015 3 1 3.0 0.021 0.585 100%
20 Friedberg, L 1998 3 1 6.0 0.021 0.585 100%
21 Ibragimov, I. and R. Khas’minskii 1985 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
22 Donoho, D. L 1994 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
23 Moon, H. R. and M. Weidner (self) 2018 2 2 1.5 0.014 0.511 50%
24 Kiefer, N 1980 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
25 Onatski, A 2012 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Bai, J. and P. Wang 2016 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. S. Rosen 1988 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Ahn, S. C., Y. H. Lee, and P. Schmidt 2001 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Ahn, S. C., Y. H. Lee, and P. Schmidt 2013 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Robertson, D. and V. Sarafidis 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Juodis, A. and V. Sarafidis 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Westerlund, J., Y. Petrova, and M. Norkute 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Higgins, A 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Juodis, A. and V. Sarafidis 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Chamberlain, G. and M. J. Moreira 2009 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Recht, B., M. Fazel, and P. A. Parrilo 2010 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and M. Wainwright 2015 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Rohde, A. and A. B. Tsybakov 2011 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Bai, J. and S. Ng 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Beyhum, J. and E. Gautier 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Chernozhukov, V., C. Hansen, Y. Liao, and Y. Zhu 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Athey, S., M. Bayati, N. Doudchenko, G. Imbens, an... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Alidaee, H., E. Auerbach, and M. P. Leung 2020 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Ma, S., L. Su, and Y. Zhang 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Belloni, A., M. Chen, O. H. Madrid Padilla, and Z.... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Wang, Y., L. Su, and Y. Zhang 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Feng, J 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Miao, K., K. Li, and L. Su 2020 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Miao, K., P. C. Phillips, and L. Su 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Ferman, B. and C. Pinto 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Arkhangelsky, D., S. Athey, D. A. Hirshberg, G. W.... 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Beyhum, J. and E. Gautier 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Fan, J. and Y. Liao 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Bai, J. and S. Ng 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Andrews, D. W. and X. Cheng 2012 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Zeleneev, A (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Freeman, H. and M. Weidner (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
58 Ishihara, T. and T. Kitagawa 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 Robinson, P. M 1988 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 Geman, S 1980 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 Bai, J. and S. Ng 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
62 Ahn, S. C. and A. R. Horenstein 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
63 Noack, C. and C. Rothe 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
64 Arellano, M 1987 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
65 Hansen, C. B 2007 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
66 Johnstone, I 2001 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
67 Soshnikov, A 2002 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
68 Pillai, N. S. and J. Yin 2012 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
69 Yang, F 2019 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
70 Horn, R. A. and C. R. Johnson 2013 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
71 Fan, K 1951 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
72 Billingsley, P 1995 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.