Citation Analysis

A Finite-Time Analysis of Multi-Agent Actor-Critic Method with Partially Shared Policies
Siliang Zeng, Mingyi Hong, Alfredo Garcia
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01282
110
Citation mentions
50
Cited references
22
Sections
7,692
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hotz, V. J. and Miller, R. A. 1993 6 4 9.0 0.055 1.000 100%
2 Ziebart, Brian D and Maas, Andrew L and Bagnell, J... 2008 5 3 7.0 0.045 1.000 100%
3 Garg, Divyansh and Chakraborty, Shuvam and Cundy, ... 2021 7 4 12.0 0.064 1.000 100%
4 Ni, Tianwei and Sikchi, Harshit and Wang, Yufei an... 2020 7 5 12.0 0.064 1.000 100%
5 Haarnoja, Tuomas and Zhou, Aurick and Abbeel, Piet... 2018 5 3 10.0 0.045 1.000 100%
6 Cen, Shicong and Cheng, Chen and Chen, Yuxin and W... 2021 7 5 14.0 0.064 1.000 100%
7 Rust, J. 1987 4 3 6.0 0.036 0.928 100%
8 Hotz, V. J. and Miller, R. A. and Sanders, S. and ... 1994 4 3 6.0 0.036 0.928 100%
9 Rust, J. 1994 4 3 8.0 0.036 0.928 100%
10 Haarnoja, Tuomas and Tang, Haoran and Abbeel, Piet... 2017 4 3 8.0 0.036 0.928 100%
11 Zeng, Siliang and Li, Chenliang and Garcia, Alfred... (self) 2023 3 2 5.0 0.027 0.737 100%
12 Hong, Mingyi and Wai, Hoi-To and Wang, Zhaoran and... (self) 2020 3 2 6.0 0.027 0.737 100%
13 Victor Aguirregabiria and Pedro Mira 2002 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 Bajari, Patrick and Benkard, C. Lanier and Levin, ... 2007 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Reich, G. 2018 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
16 Su, C. L. and Judd, K. L. 2012 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
17 Karun Adusumilli and Dita Eckardt 2022 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
18 Chernozhukov, Victor and Escanciano, Juan Carlos a... 2022 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
19 Ziebart, Brian D and Bagnell, J Andrew and Dey, An... 2010 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
20 Wulfmeier, Markus and Ondruska, Peter and Posner, ... 2015 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
21 Wu, Yue Frank and Zhang, Weitong and Xu, Pan and G... 2020 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
22 Sanghvi, Navyata and Usami, Shinnosuke and Sharma,... 2021 3 1 6.0 0.027 0.585 100%
23 Fu, Justin and Luo, Katie and Levine, Sergey 2017 3 1 6.0 0.027 0.585 100%
24 Tishby, Naftali and Polani, Daniel 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Ortega, Pedro A. and Braun, Daniel A. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Matějka, Filip and McKay, Alisdair 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Cayci, Semih and He, Niao and Srikant, R 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Mai, Tien and Jaillet, Patrick 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Konda, Vijay and Tsitsiklis, John 1999 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Borkar, Vivek S 1997 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Bhandari, Jalaj and Russo, Daniel and Singal, Ragh... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Zou, Shaofeng and Xu, Tengyu and Liang, Yingbin 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Jin, Chi and Netrapalli, Praneeth and Jordan, Mich... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Guan, Ziwei and Xu, Tengyu and Liang, Yingbin 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Khanduri, Prashant and Zeng, Siliang and Hong, Min... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Chen, Tianyi and Sun, Yuejiao and Yin, Wotao 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Ziebart, Brian D. and Bagnell, J. Andrew and Dey, ... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Jacot, Arthur and Gabriel, Franck and Hongler, Cle... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Yu, Chao and Liu, Jiming and Nemati, Shamim and Yi... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Kiran, B Ravi and Sobh, Ibrahim and Talpaert, Vict... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Viano, Luca and Huang, Yu-Ting and Kamalaruban, Pa... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Todorov, Emanuel and Erez, Tom and Tassa, Yuval 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Pomerleau, Dean A 1988 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Ho, Jonathan and Ermon, Stefano 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Xu, Tengyu and Wang, Zhe and Liang, Yingbin 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Zeng, Siliang and Li, Chenliang and Garcia, Alfred... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.